What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Death of the DSLR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ChrisKten" data-source="post: 1633350" data-attributes="member: 69033"><p>OK, I'll play for a little longer, then I really have to go:</p><p></p><p>A couple of things, what you don't have is a crystal ball. </p><p>Now, knowing nothing of Physics, and having no degrees, means that I can't argue about what can and can't be done today (well I could cut and paste from Wikipedia, but that would be pointless). But let's suppose that a new material was discovered/invented that had properties far superior to glass. And this material was unbelievably (by today's standards) efficient at collecting light. Wouldn't this change the rules slightly as far as lens size?</p><p></p><p>Also, the title of this thread was "Death of the DSLR", are you saying that there will always be DSLRs? Of course there will be top of the line Cameras that most people can't afford, but will they be DSLRs as we know then today?</p><p></p><p>Incidentally, I actually never intended to comment much in this thread, I just thought that others might find the article interesting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ChrisKten, post: 1633350, member: 69033"] OK, I'll play for a little longer, then I really have to go: A couple of things, what you don't have is a crystal ball. Now, knowing nothing of Physics, and having no degrees, means that I can't argue about what can and can't be done today (well I could cut and paste from Wikipedia, but that would be pointless). But let's suppose that a new material was discovered/invented that had properties far superior to glass. And this material was unbelievably (by today's standards) efficient at collecting light. Wouldn't this change the rules slightly as far as lens size? Also, the title of this thread was "Death of the DSLR", are you saying that there will always be DSLRs? Of course there will be top of the line Cameras that most people can't afford, but will they be DSLRs as we know then today? Incidentally, I actually never intended to comment much in this thread, I just thought that others might find the article interesting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Death of the DSLR
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top