What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Death of the DSLR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RAH" data-source="post: 1633449" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>Just want to add to this interesting discussion that one of the limiting factors concerning image quality is the OPTICS. Granted they can keep improving glass technology, etc, but it is still a physical thing, not electronic, so there is a limit to what you can do, at least in the near and middle future. You probably cannot create a 600mm 2.8 lens that is the size of a walnut, just to give one obvious example.</p><p></p><p>Of course, you can always electronically manipulate what comes out of the lens, but you are still limited by the physical aspects of the lens (as in "garbage in, garbage out"). So, no matter how much you shrink your sensors, it doesn't buy you too much if you have to attach these to a big lens.</p><p></p><p>I suppose eventually they won't be using glass for lenses, or any kind of optical thing, but some other technology to capture the view, but that will be a long time coming, I should think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RAH, post: 1633449, member: 5834"] Just want to add to this interesting discussion that one of the limiting factors concerning image quality is the OPTICS. Granted they can keep improving glass technology, etc, but it is still a physical thing, not electronic, so there is a limit to what you can do, at least in the near and middle future. You probably cannot create a 600mm 2.8 lens that is the size of a walnut, just to give one obvious example. Of course, you can always electronically manipulate what comes out of the lens, but you are still limited by the physical aspects of the lens (as in "garbage in, garbage out"). So, no matter how much you shrink your sensors, it doesn't buy you too much if you have to attach these to a big lens. I suppose eventually they won't be using glass for lenses, or any kind of optical thing, but some other technology to capture the view, but that will be a long time coming, I should think. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Death of the DSLR
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top