What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Death of the DSLR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ChrisKten" data-source="post: 1633481" data-attributes="member: 69033"><p>TBH, Thomas, I'm not really missing any points. In my naive way I'm trying to get people to say what they think about what is, and isn't, possible.</p><p></p><p>I've found over the years in forums, that if you just ask a question, you don't always get an answer. But if you behave a bit like a Troll, people get a little irritated and actually post interesting responses. In the end I tend to learn more than by just asking the question.|=)|</p><p></p><p>I have no idea where Cameras are heading, only the Manufacturers will decide that. I suppose that they could respond to pressure from Consumers, but only if it affects their profits. </p><p></p><p>A couple of questions spring to mind:</p><p></p><p>Does Cannon/Nikon/et al, actually need to produce better P&S type cameras, or do they make enough profit from their top end lenses and cameras? </p><p></p><p>And on Optics; if a new (yet to be discovered) material can gather all of the visible spectrum of light, in a much reduced size. And if everything that the Human Eye sees, is faithfully reproduced. What would be the advantage of increasing the size of this new "Lens"?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ChrisKten, post: 1633481, member: 69033"] TBH, Thomas, I'm not really missing any points. In my naive way I'm trying to get people to say what they think about what is, and isn't, possible. I've found over the years in forums, that if you just ask a question, you don't always get an answer. But if you behave a bit like a Troll, people get a little irritated and actually post interesting responses. In the end I tend to learn more than by just asking the question.|=)| I have no idea where Cameras are heading, only the Manufacturers will decide that. I suppose that they could respond to pressure from Consumers, but only if it affects their profits. A couple of questions spring to mind: Does Cannon/Nikon/et al, actually need to produce better P&S type cameras, or do they make enough profit from their top end lenses and cameras? And on Optics; if a new (yet to be discovered) material can gather all of the visible spectrum of light, in a much reduced size. And if everything that the Human Eye sees, is faithfully reproduced. What would be the advantage of increasing the size of this new "Lens"? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Death of the DSLR
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top