What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swift
Definition of "waterproof"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkcub" data-source="post: 2094177" data-attributes="member: 14473"><p>I hate to be the one to bust the bubble, but, factually, neither the original 820 nor the 820ED were nitrogen filled. The 804ED that preceded them was not nitrogen filled either. I'm not sure about the new 820s, which have a different construction and may or may not be nitrogen purged. </p><p></p><p>While rumor busting, the original 820ED also did not have air-spaced objectives like its predecessor the 804ED. </p><p></p><p>This has all been confirmed by Nicolas Crista, and apparently resulted from a bit of faulty advertising, which I've seen evidence for in several catalogs and fliers.</p><p></p><p>For these models, then, "waterproof" simply meant that o-rings were used at various locations to prevent water flooding into the innards. Its effectiveness has been questioned by many, and it's not comparable to the waterproofing given to internally focusing roof designs. </p><p></p><p>Regards,</p><p>Ed</p><p></p><p>Bkrownd, </p><p>I'd suggest contacting Nicolas Crista about repairing your soggy binoculars. <a href="http://www.nrcoptics.com/" target="_blank">http://www.nrcoptics.com/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkcub, post: 2094177, member: 14473"] I hate to be the one to bust the bubble, but, factually, neither the original 820 nor the 820ED were nitrogen filled. The 804ED that preceded them was not nitrogen filled either. I'm not sure about the new 820s, which have a different construction and may or may not be nitrogen purged. While rumor busting, the original 820ED also did not have air-spaced objectives like its predecessor the 804ED. This has all been confirmed by Nicolas Crista, and apparently resulted from a bit of faulty advertising, which I've seen evidence for in several catalogs and fliers. For these models, then, "waterproof" simply meant that o-rings were used at various locations to prevent water flooding into the innards. Its effectiveness has been questioned by many, and it's not comparable to the waterproofing given to internally focusing roof designs. Regards, Ed Bkrownd, I'd suggest contacting Nicolas Crista about repairing your soggy binoculars. [url]http://www.nrcoptics.com/[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swift
Definition of "waterproof"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top