What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Depth of Focus
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkcub" data-source="post: 1533823" data-attributes="member: 14473"><p>Ron,</p><p></p><p>My slightly different way of saying it is that the observer uses information in the image to control precise focus on the retina (i.e., visual accommodation). A key source of such feedback information is known to be chromatic aberration. Consistent with what you said, this control mechanism would help to overcome focus uncertainly due to an increase in DOF with smaller pupil size. And, along with greater illumination contrast, the whole biofeedback mechanism would work to optimize visual clarity. </p><p></p><p>Since it may be assumed that a binocular-telescope image on the retina is focused using similar criteria, some minimum CA from the instrument may also be beneficial, if not necessary. Of course, even using ED glass in the objective there is no concern about having too little, since some fringing can always be seen. Still, it points up that the ultimate optimization can't be done by optics alone, but has to take into account the observer's oculomotor and perceptual systems.</p><p></p><p>Are we on the same wavelength? </p><p>Ed</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkcub, post: 1533823, member: 14473"] Ron, My slightly different way of saying it is that the observer uses information in the image to control precise focus on the retina (i.e., visual accommodation). A key source of such feedback information is known to be chromatic aberration. Consistent with what you said, this control mechanism would help to overcome focus uncertainly due to an increase in DOF with smaller pupil size. And, along with greater illumination contrast, the whole biofeedback mechanism would work to optimize visual clarity. Since it may be assumed that a binocular-telescope image on the retina is focused using similar criteria, some minimum CA from the instrument may also be beneficial, if not necessary. Of course, even using ED glass in the objective there is no concern about having too little, since some fringing can always be seen. Still, it points up that the ultimate optimization can't be done by optics alone, but has to take into account the observer's oculomotor and perceptual systems. Are we on the same wavelength? Ed [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Depth of Focus
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top