What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Difference? Spotting vs Astro Scopes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DRodrigues" data-source="post: 1241181" data-attributes="member: 55152"><p><strong>Siebert Power Mag Wheel</strong></p><p></p><p>In my "fight" for cr-birding binoviewing I tested another step: - finally I received the Siebert PMW. I'm a bit frustrated for not receiving the total material I ordered - instead of the Power Mag Wheel for SCT/Mak Minus 0.6x - 1x - 1.5x - 2x - 2.5x with the extra 3x and 4x cells, I just received the Power Mag Wheel for refractors 1.0x - 1.6x - 2x - 2.5x - 3.0x |=(| - even if they want to correct the shipment I will not have a person coming from USA soon...</p><p>Concerning the PMW, after a first false disappointment (first I putted the PMW between the C5 and the image erector), I was convinced about the validity of the solution - using 30 and 42mm Celestron ultima eyepieces, they remained sharp in all magnifications, which made me :C for not receiving all material... If the 3x worked well in a cloudy day as today (yes, sometimes we have it...), the 4x would work in a normal day... With the PMW after the image erector, and before the eyepiece, the focal length of the telescope seem to increase well more than 25%, which increase even more the interest of the 0.6x cell. I hope to have time to test more the PMW during the next weeks, doing a resolution test (it increased the resolution reading a distant duck saddle code, comparing with the Optolyth 100 at 90x), hope to test a couple of focal length reducers and eventually a 2" eyepiece - I'm guessing that a 35mm or lower wide angle would be a good solution, with a huge field of view. By the way, didn't get the 4 or 5x zoom but at least I got a 3x zoom with a constant apparent field of view - fanatics of wide-angles, this is a solution for you!!! Another not so good detail - it doesn't work in the Pentax PF100 neither on the Optolyth 100 - it doesn't reach focus in all magnifications, with all eyepieces...</p><p>Bino-viewing in cr-birding is closer but the binoviewer purchasing will take longer since it's a "bit" expensive - I will need one that will not vignette with 32 or 42mm eyepieces - these have the same field-stop of the 24mm wideangled eyepieces, but increase less - a need with mirror telescopes.</p><p>Will comeback, when possible...</p><p>David</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DRodrigues, post: 1241181, member: 55152"] [b]Siebert Power Mag Wheel[/b] In my "fight" for cr-birding binoviewing I tested another step: - finally I received the Siebert PMW. I'm a bit frustrated for not receiving the total material I ordered - instead of the Power Mag Wheel for SCT/Mak Minus 0.6x - 1x - 1.5x - 2x - 2.5x with the extra 3x and 4x cells, I just received the Power Mag Wheel for refractors 1.0x - 1.6x - 2x - 2.5x - 3.0x |=(| - even if they want to correct the shipment I will not have a person coming from USA soon... Concerning the PMW, after a first false disappointment (first I putted the PMW between the C5 and the image erector), I was convinced about the validity of the solution - using 30 and 42mm Celestron ultima eyepieces, they remained sharp in all magnifications, which made me :C for not receiving all material... If the 3x worked well in a cloudy day as today (yes, sometimes we have it...), the 4x would work in a normal day... With the PMW after the image erector, and before the eyepiece, the focal length of the telescope seem to increase well more than 25%, which increase even more the interest of the 0.6x cell. I hope to have time to test more the PMW during the next weeks, doing a resolution test (it increased the resolution reading a distant duck saddle code, comparing with the Optolyth 100 at 90x), hope to test a couple of focal length reducers and eventually a 2" eyepiece - I'm guessing that a 35mm or lower wide angle would be a good solution, with a huge field of view. By the way, didn't get the 4 or 5x zoom but at least I got a 3x zoom with a constant apparent field of view - fanatics of wide-angles, this is a solution for you!!! Another not so good detail - it doesn't work in the Pentax PF100 neither on the Optolyth 100 - it doesn't reach focus in all magnifications, with all eyepieces... Bino-viewing in cr-birding is closer but the binoviewer purchasing will take longer since it's a "bit" expensive - I will need one that will not vignette with 32 or 42mm eyepieces - these have the same field-stop of the 24mm wideangled eyepieces, but increase less - a need with mirror telescopes. Will comeback, when possible... David [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Difference? Spotting vs Astro Scopes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top