What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Digiscoping with Nikon ED50 which eyepieces are suitable
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mcepjg" data-source="post: 1693271" data-attributes="member: 27259"><p>Thanks for the comments they are very helpful and from what you've said it's encouraging to know that decent digiscoping results can be achieved by all the eyepieces (although with the 27x very bright conditions are necessary). </p><p></p><p>RJM Those are good results with the zoom lens and the hand held camera, I worried the zoom lense would be too dark to get shots like those but evidently it is also very good.</p><p></p><p>At the moment I could only afford one eyepiece and I'm unsure what to get. </p><p></p><p>I've got a feeling that the best combination of two eyepieces overall would be one of the 27x eyepieces (for day to day birding) and a 16x eyepiece (for scanning for birds before swapping lenses to the 27x, digiscoping and for use on dim days). However the 20x and zoom probably offer the best compromise (not as bright as the 16x for digiscoping, not as good as the 27x for id'ing but capable for both).</p><p></p><p>Horukuru, have you tried the 27x DS against the 27x MC? why did you pick the 27x DS rather than the 27x MC? is the MC any better optically? is the MC suitable for digiscoping?</p><p></p><p>Thanks aagin for your helpful comments, Pete</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mcepjg, post: 1693271, member: 27259"] Thanks for the comments they are very helpful and from what you've said it's encouraging to know that decent digiscoping results can be achieved by all the eyepieces (although with the 27x very bright conditions are necessary). RJM Those are good results with the zoom lens and the hand held camera, I worried the zoom lense would be too dark to get shots like those but evidently it is also very good. At the moment I could only afford one eyepiece and I'm unsure what to get. I've got a feeling that the best combination of two eyepieces overall would be one of the 27x eyepieces (for day to day birding) and a 16x eyepiece (for scanning for birds before swapping lenses to the 27x, digiscoping and for use on dim days). However the 20x and zoom probably offer the best compromise (not as bright as the 16x for digiscoping, not as good as the 27x for id'ing but capable for both). Horukuru, have you tried the 27x DS against the 27x MC? why did you pick the 27x DS rather than the 27x MC? is the MC any better optically? is the MC suitable for digiscoping? Thanks aagin for your helpful comments, Pete [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Digiscoping with Nikon ED50 which eyepieces are suitable
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top