What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Wildlife Art
Disgusting "art" from slaughtered wild birds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pie" data-source="post: 1481171" data-attributes="member: 35255"><p>Describing this form of art as "disgusting" is personal viewpoint, as with all opinions on art. It's impossible to validate one opinion over another. </p><p></p><p> I am disappointed the artist felt the need to justify her work and in doing so, removed the element of mystery and curiosity. imo</p><p>Take Banksy for example, he is visible by his absence!</p><p>For me, the most interesting aspect of looking at Old Masters is the question "what is the artist saying?"</p><p></p><p>As for the images depicted, I feel they lack any kind of impact.</p><p> To me, they look no more creative than a child burying the pet hamster in the garden.</p><p>I'm sorry, but the "ring a ring o rosies" look pointless and random.</p><p> </p><p>On the other hand, the images posted by Nick Derry are thought provoking and have enormous impact. </p><p></p><p>Interesting debate.</p><p></p><p></p><p>note, I am very sorry to hear about the nasty emails sent to the artist and hope the matter is soon resolved.</p><p>If the sender is on the forum, can I ask you to stop the personal attacks and debate your feelings here. :t:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pie, post: 1481171, member: 35255"] Describing this form of art as "disgusting" is personal viewpoint, as with all opinions on art. It's impossible to validate one opinion over another. I am disappointed the artist felt the need to justify her work and in doing so, removed the element of mystery and curiosity. imo Take Banksy for example, he is visible by his absence! For me, the most interesting aspect of looking at Old Masters is the question "what is the artist saying?" As for the images depicted, I feel they lack any kind of impact. To me, they look no more creative than a child burying the pet hamster in the garden. I'm sorry, but the "ring a ring o rosies" look pointless and random. On the other hand, the images posted by Nick Derry are thought provoking and have enormous impact. Interesting debate. note, I am very sorry to hear about the nasty emails sent to the artist and hope the matter is soon resolved. If the sender is on the forum, can I ask you to stop the personal attacks and debate your feelings here. :t: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Wildlife Art
Disgusting "art" from slaughtered wild birds
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top