BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="etudiant" data-source="post: 3469753" data-attributes="member: 48052">I don't think discussing the pros and cons of image stabilization is at all off topic. The OP is seeking input on the benefit of buying more expensive binoculars. Stabilization provides a great benefit for viewing, but the package ergonomics still has weaknesses, mostly bulk and weight, but also poor warranty life and modest eye relief.In practice, these issues largely disappear. I wear glasses also and the eye relief on my Canon 10x42 is adequate, A good strap/harness helps deal with the weight and there really is no problem with battery life. The batteries are only used when actuated, typically when actually following a bird. That is only a small fraction of the time, unless one is seawatching.For intensive normal use, the batteries last at least a couple of weeks before needing a recharge. As Hermann has noted, Eneloops work very well and are not costly. Even if the batteries die while birding, the view is unaffected, just the stabilization ends.</blockquote>