What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Do the optics greatly improve with the price?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3470611" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>Regarding resolution of holes.</p><p></p><p>I punched 5.85mm or 0.23 inch holes in a foolscap white sheet of paper.</p><p>At night with the paper against the window, dark outside. Kitchen illumination 6ft fluorescent tube.</p><p>The furthest back I could get was 12.82 yards, Leica Disto rangefinder.</p><p>Correcting for .22 holes this gives 12.25 yards.</p><p></p><p>The holes were easily seen with my distance glasses, 20/16 vision rather poor room lighting for me, perhaps 4mm pupils. This was with either eye or both eyes.</p><p>In fact I glimpsed them without glasses where my eyes are completely out of focus, and very poor resolution.</p><p></p><p>Using binoculars I think it essential to tripod mount them or use current model Canon IS binoculars.</p><p>The difference is glimpsing or seeing steadily.</p><p>The improvement should be above 50%.</p><p></p><p>I don't know what the standard conditions are meant to be, but the essentials are.</p><p></p><p>Illumination.</p><p>Contrast. (If this is poor then there is a drastic reduction in resolution).</p><p>Background darkness and colour.</p><p>Pupil size.</p><p>Acuity.</p><p>Steady image.</p><p></p><p>I can't think of a suitable location here to place the holes at 100, 200 or 300 yards and view with binoculars.</p><p></p><p>Looking at the full Moon, I could easily make out the brightening around the crater Tycho with unaided eyes and distance glasses, but only in the dull reflection in the double glazing which retains all the detail. The normal brightness Moon seen directly was too bright and washed out the image.</p><p></p><p>P.S.</p><p>For seeing the small holes, the illumination should not be too bright or too dull, ideally variable neutral density filters should be used.</p><p>Some British military binoculars had filters within. These were good, but fixed densities, not variable.</p><p></p><p>The background to a white target should be black.</p><p>If the background is light the holes might not be seen even close up.</p><p></p><p>As well as tripod mounting the binocular, ones head should also be braced. For me this provides about 10% more resolution.</p><p></p><p>For unaided eyes viewing with distance glasses on a bright day, a large neutral density filter can be tilted until it gives the optimum density.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3470611, member: 111403"] Regarding resolution of holes. I punched 5.85mm or 0.23 inch holes in a foolscap white sheet of paper. At night with the paper against the window, dark outside. Kitchen illumination 6ft fluorescent tube. The furthest back I could get was 12.82 yards, Leica Disto rangefinder. Correcting for .22 holes this gives 12.25 yards. The holes were easily seen with my distance glasses, 20/16 vision rather poor room lighting for me, perhaps 4mm pupils. This was with either eye or both eyes. In fact I glimpsed them without glasses where my eyes are completely out of focus, and very poor resolution. Using binoculars I think it essential to tripod mount them or use current model Canon IS binoculars. The difference is glimpsing or seeing steadily. The improvement should be above 50%. I don't know what the standard conditions are meant to be, but the essentials are. Illumination. Contrast. (If this is poor then there is a drastic reduction in resolution). Background darkness and colour. Pupil size. Acuity. Steady image. I can't think of a suitable location here to place the holes at 100, 200 or 300 yards and view with binoculars. Looking at the full Moon, I could easily make out the brightening around the crater Tycho with unaided eyes and distance glasses, but only in the dull reflection in the double glazing which retains all the detail. The normal brightness Moon seen directly was too bright and washed out the image. P.S. For seeing the small holes, the illumination should not be too bright or too dull, ideally variable neutral density filters should be used. Some British military binoculars had filters within. These were good, but fixed densities, not variable. The background to a white target should be black. If the background is light the holes might not be seen even close up. As well as tripod mounting the binocular, ones head should also be braced. For me this provides about 10% more resolution. For unaided eyes viewing with distance glasses on a bright day, a large neutral density filter can be tilted until it gives the optimum density. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Do the optics greatly improve with the price?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top