What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Do you ignore Leica ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Uhu74" data-source="post: 3211598" data-attributes="member: 126376"><p>Totally agree, when my wife compared our new Trinny to the 32SV, at first glance she thought the Trinny had the bigger FOV of the 2.....</p><p>The Trinny has "only" 126m FOV (although I read a test which measured almost 128m actual FOV for the LT, compared to 123m actual for the Conquest HD, which is specified for 128m) but this is less dramatical as you think it would be.</p><p>My brother in law's Kowa SV8x42 at 110m on the other hand gives a bit of a restricted view to me.</p><p>Sort of a "tunnel view". So I dare to say, a 110m vs 125m FOV will appear more dramatic than 130m vs 145m FOV.</p><p>Since we also have the Trinovid in house, I catch myself picking the LT over the SV more and more..... Says enough i guess:eat:</p><p>I suppose THAT'S the "Leica view" what people are talking about. I like it a lot!</p><p></p><p>Kind regards,</p><p></p><p>Gijs</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Uhu74, post: 3211598, member: 126376"] Totally agree, when my wife compared our new Trinny to the 32SV, at first glance she thought the Trinny had the bigger FOV of the 2..... The Trinny has "only" 126m FOV (although I read a test which measured almost 128m actual FOV for the LT, compared to 123m actual for the Conquest HD, which is specified for 128m) but this is less dramatical as you think it would be. My brother in law's Kowa SV8x42 at 110m on the other hand gives a bit of a restricted view to me. Sort of a "tunnel view". So I dare to say, a 110m vs 125m FOV will appear more dramatic than 130m vs 145m FOV. Since we also have the Trinovid in house, I catch myself picking the LT over the SV more and more..... Says enough i guess:eat: I suppose THAT'S the "Leica view" what people are talking about. I like it a lot! Kind regards, Gijs [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Do you ignore Leica ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top