What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Does Nikon EDG series have repellent lens coatings?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BruceH" data-source="post: 2405872" data-attributes="member: 106398"><p>I appreciate the responses to my post. It appears the answer to my first question is that Nikon EDG lens do not have repellent properties. </p><p></p><p>I found the light transmission post from Dennis interesting and my first thought was the same as Brock ...... Does the repellent coating have any material impact on light transmission? The closest binocular to the EDG (lens flatteners) that I could think of is the Swarovski EL Swarovision. According to the Allbinos.Com web site the Swarovski SV 10X42 transmission is 90.8% while the Nikon EDG 10X42 is 88.5%. The Swarovski with the Swaroclean coating beats the Nikon, so that makes me think the impact of the coating on light transmission is not much. </p><p></p><p>My other question was how significant is the omission of a repellent coating from an alpha class binocular? I see that as a subjective answer depending on the person's priorities. </p><p></p><p>The quality of the view is extremely important to most and I would think the lack of a repellent coating should not directly degrade from that. In that case, the lack of the coating is no big deal when the view is all that matters. </p><p></p><p>However, a $2,000+ (US) binocular should have all the main features found in other alpha models, and that includes repellent coating. I think I would feel that I was getting less than what I paid for if I bought the Nikon EDG at the normal selling price, when considering I could obtain a comparable view and repellent coating from the competition. I not sure if the lack of the coating would stop me from buying the Nikon, but I know it would be a significant factor in my evaluation.</p><p></p><p>How would the lack of repellent coating impact your decision to buy a Nikon EDG at their normal selling price? If it would stop you from buying, how about after deducting the $500 promotion now taking place in the US?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BruceH, post: 2405872, member: 106398"] I appreciate the responses to my post. It appears the answer to my first question is that Nikon EDG lens do not have repellent properties. I found the light transmission post from Dennis interesting and my first thought was the same as Brock ...... Does the repellent coating have any material impact on light transmission? The closest binocular to the EDG (lens flatteners) that I could think of is the Swarovski EL Swarovision. According to the Allbinos.Com web site the Swarovski SV 10X42 transmission is 90.8% while the Nikon EDG 10X42 is 88.5%. The Swarovski with the Swaroclean coating beats the Nikon, so that makes me think the impact of the coating on light transmission is not much. My other question was how significant is the omission of a repellent coating from an alpha class binocular? I see that as a subjective answer depending on the person's priorities. The quality of the view is extremely important to most and I would think the lack of a repellent coating should not directly degrade from that. In that case, the lack of the coating is no big deal when the view is all that matters. However, a $2,000+ (US) binocular should have all the main features found in other alpha models, and that includes repellent coating. I think I would feel that I was getting less than what I paid for if I bought the Nikon EDG at the normal selling price, when considering I could obtain a comparable view and repellent coating from the competition. I not sure if the lack of the coating would stop me from buying the Nikon, but I know it would be a significant factor in my evaluation. How would the lack of repellent coating impact your decision to buy a Nikon EDG at their normal selling price? If it would stop you from buying, how about after deducting the $500 promotion now taking place in the US? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Does Nikon EDG series have repellent lens coatings?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top