What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Does the Sigma 150-500 really get to 500mm?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Roy C" data-source="post: 1734829" data-attributes="member: 18798"><p>From everything I have read the 100-400 is reckoned to be somewhere around 385mm at the long end although I believe the shooting distance could be a factor. There is a old thread somewhere on BF where someone posted two pics taken with the same camera on the same day from the same spot, one with the 100-400 at the long end and one with the 400/5.6 - the target was was noticeable larger with the prime. </p><p>I also saw a thread on another forum where someone compared shots with the Bigma (50-500) at the long end and the 400/5.6 and they could hardly believe how little difference there appeared to be in focal lengths. The poster calculated the bigma as being around 460mm at the long end.</p><p>It seems like zooms are more variable than primes probably because of the lens construction. I have also read that the focal length of zooms are calculated when shooting at infinity.</p><p></p><p>Before anyone jumps on me I must emphasise that I have not personally tested any of the lens mentioned but could probably find the threads I quoted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Roy C, post: 1734829, member: 18798"] From everything I have read the 100-400 is reckoned to be somewhere around 385mm at the long end although I believe the shooting distance could be a factor. There is a old thread somewhere on BF where someone posted two pics taken with the same camera on the same day from the same spot, one with the 100-400 at the long end and one with the 400/5.6 - the target was was noticeable larger with the prime. I also saw a thread on another forum where someone compared shots with the Bigma (50-500) at the long end and the 400/5.6 and they could hardly believe how little difference there appeared to be in focal lengths. The poster calculated the bigma as being around 460mm at the long end. It seems like zooms are more variable than primes probably because of the lens construction. I have also read that the focal length of zooms are calculated when shooting at infinity. Before anyone jumps on me I must emphasise that I have not personally tested any of the lens mentioned but could probably find the threads I quoted. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Does the Sigma 150-500 really get to 500mm?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top