What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Does the Sigma 150-500 really get to 500mm?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fowl Mouth" data-source="post: 1737245" data-attributes="member: 30266"><p>I think I'm going off topic here, but since I've already started, I might as well give some quick examples.</p><p></p><p>The first image is fairly self explanatory, but I'll add some comments. These are cropped portions of a USD 1 Dollar bill. The scale of the 500mm image was reduced to match the per-pixel scale of the 400mm (403mm) image. That alone should give the 500mm image an advantage since down-sizing always "sharpens" the image. I think the result speaks for itself.</p><p></p><p>As for the Male Cardinal images, these were the two closest direct subject images I could find in my archives to closely demonstrate the effect in real field use. In this particular circumstance the Cardinals are both 100% crops. Aside from importing the original RAW files into Adobe Light Room, and compressing into JPEG, these are completely unprocessed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fowl Mouth, post: 1737245, member: 30266"] I think I'm going off topic here, but since I've already started, I might as well give some quick examples. The first image is fairly self explanatory, but I'll add some comments. These are cropped portions of a USD 1 Dollar bill. The scale of the 500mm image was reduced to match the per-pixel scale of the 400mm (403mm) image. That alone should give the 500mm image an advantage since down-sizing always "sharpens" the image. I think the result speaks for itself. As for the Male Cardinal images, these were the two closest direct subject images I could find in my archives to closely demonstrate the effect in real field use. In this particular circumstance the Cardinals are both 100% crops. Aside from importing the original RAW files into Adobe Light Room, and compressing into JPEG, these are completely unprocessed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Does the Sigma 150-500 really get to 500mm?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top