What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Does the Sigma 150-500 really get to 500mm?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alanrharris53" data-source="post: 1737919" data-attributes="member: 61894"><p>Thanks everybody.</p><p></p><p>I managed to get out yesterday and took some pictures with both the Tamron and the Sigma. Not very scientific but trying to reflect the real conditions in the field.</p><p></p><p>First went and took some bird photos at a local spot where they are fairly tame. Overall in good light there seemed to be little difference in the image quality between the two lenses at 500mm f8. (As mentioned above the Tamron is also a lot sharper at f8 than wide open.) If anything the Tamron apeared very marginally sharper - but I took about 200 photos and it was only noticable on one or two shots.</p><p></p><p>The difference in reach at 500mm was not noticable in actual use. Although I still think it might be an issue when taking birds at a greater distance than I was shooting yesterday, where you have to crop more.</p><p></p><p>The AF is a lot faster with the Sigma too. I managed to grab a couple of black headed gulls in flight which I couldn't manage with the Tamron. I haven't posted them as they are not great shots, but convinced me the potential is there.</p><p></p><p>I then went to take some picture of the deer in the local park. As I got there it turned very dark. And after taking about another 200 shots it started to snow! So I didn't get chance to compare with the Tamron but I know from experience that the photos I was taking at slow shutter speeds with the OS on would have been impossible with the Tamron.</p><p></p><p>Overall intial impressions are that the OS and AF are both showing the advantage I was looking for in moving over to the Sigma. But the Tamron is still a good lens in good light and may well be marginally sharper at 500mm.</p><p></p><p>I will keep both lenses for a while and do some more comparisons but initial shots here if you are interested...</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/alan-photos/sets/72157623467395414/" target="_blank">http://www.flickr.com/photos/alan-photos/sets/72157623467395414/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alanrharris53, post: 1737919, member: 61894"] Thanks everybody. I managed to get out yesterday and took some pictures with both the Tamron and the Sigma. Not very scientific but trying to reflect the real conditions in the field. First went and took some bird photos at a local spot where they are fairly tame. Overall in good light there seemed to be little difference in the image quality between the two lenses at 500mm f8. (As mentioned above the Tamron is also a lot sharper at f8 than wide open.) If anything the Tamron apeared very marginally sharper - but I took about 200 photos and it was only noticable on one or two shots. The difference in reach at 500mm was not noticable in actual use. Although I still think it might be an issue when taking birds at a greater distance than I was shooting yesterday, where you have to crop more. The AF is a lot faster with the Sigma too. I managed to grab a couple of black headed gulls in flight which I couldn't manage with the Tamron. I haven't posted them as they are not great shots, but convinced me the potential is there. I then went to take some picture of the deer in the local park. As I got there it turned very dark. And after taking about another 200 shots it started to snow! So I didn't get chance to compare with the Tamron but I know from experience that the photos I was taking at slow shutter speeds with the OS on would have been impossible with the Tamron. Overall intial impressions are that the OS and AF are both showing the advantage I was looking for in moving over to the Sigma. But the Tamron is still a good lens in good light and may well be marginally sharper at 500mm. I will keep both lenses for a while and do some more comparisons but initial shots here if you are interested... [URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/alan-photos/sets/72157623467395414/"]http://www.flickr.com/photos/alan-photos/sets/72157623467395414/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Does the Sigma 150-500 really get to 500mm?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top