What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds Of Prey
Eagle Owls in Britain, Scientific Paper by The World Owl Trust
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PaulD" data-source="post: 1750725" data-attributes="member: 11840"><p>Sorry I must be a bit slow this afternoon, but are you suggesting that I used mean distance travelled rather than longest distance travelled because that suited my argument better?</p><p></p><p>If you compare mean distance travelled then Eagle Owl comes out as <u>less </u>sedentary than Tawny and Little Owls (52, 15 + 15 km respectively).</p><p></p><p>If you compare longest distance travelled then Eagle Owl comes out as <u>more </u>sedentary than Tawny and Little Owls (528, 725 + 600km respectively). </p><p></p><p>It follows that if I was intent on showing that Eagle Owls were sedentary birds I would only have quoted longest distance travelled. But I didn't, I used mean distance travelled because I felt that was a more appropriate figure (it helped even out differences in sample sizes).</p><p></p><p>If I've misunderstood you, then apologies - please clarify.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PaulD, post: 1750725, member: 11840"] Sorry I must be a bit slow this afternoon, but are you suggesting that I used mean distance travelled rather than longest distance travelled because that suited my argument better? If you compare mean distance travelled then Eagle Owl comes out as [U]less [/U]sedentary than Tawny and Little Owls (52, 15 + 15 km respectively). If you compare longest distance travelled then Eagle Owl comes out as [U]more [/U]sedentary than Tawny and Little Owls (528, 725 + 600km respectively). It follows that if I was intent on showing that Eagle Owls were sedentary birds I would only have quoted longest distance travelled. But I didn't, I used mean distance travelled because I felt that was a more appropriate figure (it helped even out differences in sample sizes). If I've misunderstood you, then apologies - please clarify. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds Of Prey
Eagle Owls in Britain, Scientific Paper by The World Owl Trust
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top