What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds Of Prey
Eagle Owls in Britain, Scientific Paper by The World Owl Trust
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bluechaffinch" data-source="post: 1750897" data-attributes="member: 19714"><p>With regard to ringing recoveries - these are at best a hit-and-miss affair and where small numbers of birds are ringed (I am assuming that the sample size for EO is small compared to most species) recoveries and the data produced by them should by no means be seen as representative: there is huge bias inherent in recoveries generally, especially where the recoveries are generated from random encounters with dead birds (I presume again that most recoveries relate to corpses rather than retraps). Of course we can make assumptions on the only data we have available, but the average distance travelled within a small sample does really permit us to be entirely confident about those assumptions: the sample mean is not the same as the actual mean. It is surely a rational position to state that these birds are physically capable of reaching our shores and, if our limited recovery sample doesn't fit, we at least admit that our data are insufficient to enable us to make a definitive statement that they do not do so. I read somewhere once "Believe the bird, not the book".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bluechaffinch, post: 1750897, member: 19714"] With regard to ringing recoveries - these are at best a hit-and-miss affair and where small numbers of birds are ringed (I am assuming that the sample size for EO is small compared to most species) recoveries and the data produced by them should by no means be seen as representative: there is huge bias inherent in recoveries generally, especially where the recoveries are generated from random encounters with dead birds (I presume again that most recoveries relate to corpses rather than retraps). Of course we can make assumptions on the only data we have available, but the average distance travelled within a small sample does really permit us to be entirely confident about those assumptions: the sample mean is not the same as the actual mean. It is surely a rational position to state that these birds are physically capable of reaching our shores and, if our limited recovery sample doesn't fit, we at least admit that our data are insufficient to enable us to make a definitive statement that they do not do so. I read somewhere once "Believe the bird, not the book". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds Of Prey
Eagle Owls in Britain, Scientific Paper by The World Owl Trust
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top