What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Pentax
ED models - how do they compete ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrankD" data-source="post: 1303612" data-attributes="member: 18544"><p>I think that is an interesting point. The reduction of color fringing on any object should provide for a sharper image...both apparent and actual. In which case it would stand to reason that an 8x ED binocular might outperform a 12.5x assuming the 12.5x does not control color fringing very well and the 8x does.</p><p></p><p>My experience with the 7x42 Trinovid BN and the 10x50 Meopta Meostar was similar to Owen's. I utilized both for hawkwatching a year or two ago. In such a situation there wasn't a single instance I can remember where the 10x actually showed me something that the 7x did not. Now the 10x50 did show notably more color fringing than the 7x in that particular situation. I am now left wondering if CA was the sole contributor or if Owen's atmospheric conditions comment also play a significant role.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrankD, post: 1303612, member: 18544"] I think that is an interesting point. The reduction of color fringing on any object should provide for a sharper image...both apparent and actual. In which case it would stand to reason that an 8x ED binocular might outperform a 12.5x assuming the 12.5x does not control color fringing very well and the 8x does. My experience with the 7x42 Trinovid BN and the 10x50 Meopta Meostar was similar to Owen's. I utilized both for hawkwatching a year or two ago. In such a situation there wasn't a single instance I can remember where the 10x actually showed me something that the 7x did not. Now the 10x50 did show notably more color fringing than the 7x in that particular situation. I am now left wondering if CA was the sole contributor or if Owen's atmospheric conditions comment also play a significant role. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Pentax
ED models - how do they compete ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top