What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
English names for Troglodytes splits
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kirk Roth" data-source="post: 1785857" data-attributes="member: 85015"><p>I definitely understand the annoyance that occurs when "laymen" fall back on the older names - whether they be retained or not. But to me, this is a question of which is more annoying to hear - a "Common Snipe" in California, or an "Oldsquaw?" For me, the answer is that they're both annoying, so we just deal with it and follow propriety! Then we'll sort out the datapoints later!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I like this idea, and if I were to gaze into my hazy crystal ball, I'd bet this is what AOU goes with. However, I would be disappointed to see "Eastern Winter Wren" (unless IOC names the Eurasian populations "Easterner Winter Wren!") I think "Boreal Winter Wren" would be a better descriptor. I feel that "Migrant Winter Wren" would be descriptive also, but much more "clunky" sounding. "Cute Winter Wren" is sounding better and better!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Wow, how did I mess up my German so badly? Apologies to all the Germans for my linguistic butchery!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kirk Roth, post: 1785857, member: 85015"] I definitely understand the annoyance that occurs when "laymen" fall back on the older names - whether they be retained or not. But to me, this is a question of which is more annoying to hear - a "Common Snipe" in California, or an "Oldsquaw?" For me, the answer is that they're both annoying, so we just deal with it and follow propriety! Then we'll sort out the datapoints later! I like this idea, and if I were to gaze into my hazy crystal ball, I'd bet this is what AOU goes with. However, I would be disappointed to see "Eastern Winter Wren" (unless IOC names the Eurasian populations "Easterner Winter Wren!") I think "Boreal Winter Wren" would be a better descriptor. I feel that "Migrant Winter Wren" would be descriptive also, but much more "clunky" sounding. "Cute Winter Wren" is sounding better and better! Wow, how did I mess up my German so badly? Apologies to all the Germans for my linguistic butchery! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
English names for Troglodytes splits
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top