What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
EOS 50D, it's officially announced
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BelfieBird" data-source="post: 1279485" data-attributes="member: 58438"><p>Been following the <em>ISO</em> convo. with interest; would agree with your opinion Roy</p><p></p><p>I'm using 20D but wanting a 2nd camera and am considering 40D - until the 50D was announced. The auto ISO doesn't sound particularly appealing but that function, as with others not needed, can be ignored.</p><p></p><p>Those of you who are users of 40D - any reason why I shouldn't go for it? Or would anyone recommend waiting to see if 50D comes down in price?</p><p></p><p>(I'm shooting mostly birds (quelle surprise) and wildlife. Have a Canon 100-400 IS lens, Sigma 18-50, Tamron prime 90mm Macro (don't like it!) and a Canon 70-300 IS lens.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BelfieBird, post: 1279485, member: 58438"] Been following the [I]ISO[/I] convo. with interest; would agree with your opinion Roy I'm using 20D but wanting a 2nd camera and am considering 40D - until the 50D was announced. The auto ISO doesn't sound particularly appealing but that function, as with others not needed, can be ignored. Those of you who are users of 40D - any reason why I shouldn't go for it? Or would anyone recommend waiting to see if 50D comes down in price? (I'm shooting mostly birds (quelle surprise) and wildlife. Have a Canon 100-400 IS lens, Sigma 18-50, Tamron prime 90mm Macro (don't like it!) and a Canon 70-300 IS lens.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
EOS 50D, it's officially announced
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top
