What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
EOS 50D, it's officially announced
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tjsimonsen" data-source="post: 1279596" data-attributes="member: 38764"><p>There are a couple of theoretical upper limits (determined by shear physics) for the resolving power of the sensor. The one you mention is determined by the actual lens. Whereas the 50D and the 1Ds mark III probably exceed the resolving power of medium quality lenses, I doubt that they have yet reached the limits of real top class glass such as 300/2.8L or 100/2.8 macro. </p><p></p><p>There is off course also the limit of the sensor itself. At one point we will reach the lower limit for how small the actual pixel can be an still yield a signal to noise ratio that is good enough to increase the real resolution of the sensor. I think we are still someway from that "final wall". At the moment <em>technology </em> is still the limit, physics are not.</p><p></p><p>Thomas</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tjsimonsen, post: 1279596, member: 38764"] There are a couple of theoretical upper limits (determined by shear physics) for the resolving power of the sensor. The one you mention is determined by the actual lens. Whereas the 50D and the 1Ds mark III probably exceed the resolving power of medium quality lenses, I doubt that they have yet reached the limits of real top class glass such as 300/2.8L or 100/2.8 macro. There is off course also the limit of the sensor itself. At one point we will reach the lower limit for how small the actual pixel can be an still yield a signal to noise ratio that is good enough to increase the real resolution of the sensor. I think we are still someway from that "final wall". At the moment [I]technology [/I] is still the limit, physics are not. Thomas [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
EOS 50D, it's officially announced
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top