I think it's always a bit dangerous to eliminate a species on range, because on this basis, Ring-billed Gull would be ruled out where I live in Europe. Yet RBG was very much a possibility here, with an upsurge in records from the 1980s into the 2000s. Now that possibility is dwindling rapidly with a continuing drop in numbers of new birds year on year. But they are still on the radar...
Despite it's fairly modest proportions (small, slim bill) compared to some RBGs, if I encountered the smaller bird here in the UK a 'red flag' would immediately trigger because of the state of moult. I don't think I've ever seen a Common Gull L canus with so many replaced (grey) wing coverts (and at least 1 tertial) so early in the season. In fact I typically wouldn't expect to see any sign of wing covert moult until the following spring. Moult of the upper-parts would typically just involve the head and body feathers, and more obviously, the scapulars (giving rise to the grey 'saddle'). My knowledge of the North American race L c brachyrhynchus (some now consider this as a potential separate species) is rather limited, but from what I have read the same holds true with respect to moult.
Ring-billed Gulls on the other hand commonly have obvious signs of such wing covert and tertial moult very early in the season (Oct/Nov, and some even in September) so this bird appears to be a typical RBG on this basis.
It's a first year bird (hatched this summer) because of the retained, and very worn/faded brown inner wing coverts, tertials and primaries.
I also wouldn't expect to see any Common/Mew gull with such heavy barring on the newly replaced grey scapulars, especially not a European bird. North American Mew Gulls do have more tendency for creamy fringes and darker sub-terminal bars (but I doubt so bold as on this bird) and more of a brown wash over the grey areas.