What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
'Ethical' binocular companies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pete_gamby" data-source="post: 3370910" data-attributes="member: 76050"><p>Some of the sources supply pretty vague information. For example, would any reasonable person believe that Alpen could do what it does on a sub $1 million turnover? A few words into Google and you can find an interview that gives a far more accurate and better sourced figure - and they even quote that same interview as a source in the report!</p><p></p><p>Similarly, they quote a Hoovers estimate for Opticron's turnover. Again, how we could employ 15 staff here, half a dozen in the US, develop our own products, advertise them, provide our dealers with a margin and still make a profit on the figure they quote is beyond my knowledge!</p><p></p><p>If a research report can't get the simple stuff right, can you trust it to have the more complex analysis and, most importantly, the conclusions accurate?</p><p></p><p>Gijs - I'm sure you found some nuggets in there but surely a research report should be gold all the way through - not leave the reader having to do his or her own research to find out which of the nuggets are not Fools Gold...?</p><p></p><p>Cheers, Pete</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pete_gamby, post: 3370910, member: 76050"] Some of the sources supply pretty vague information. For example, would any reasonable person believe that Alpen could do what it does on a sub $1 million turnover? A few words into Google and you can find an interview that gives a far more accurate and better sourced figure - and they even quote that same interview as a source in the report! Similarly, they quote a Hoovers estimate for Opticron's turnover. Again, how we could employ 15 staff here, half a dozen in the US, develop our own products, advertise them, provide our dealers with a margin and still make a profit on the figure they quote is beyond my knowledge! If a research report can't get the simple stuff right, can you trust it to have the more complex analysis and, most importantly, the conclusions accurate? Gijs - I'm sure you found some nuggets in there but surely a research report should be gold all the way through - not leave the reader having to do his or her own research to find out which of the nuggets are not Fools Gold...? Cheers, Pete [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
'Ethical' binocular companies
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top