What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
Finally compared 15X56 and 12X50 Side-By-Side
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Patudo" data-source="post: 3675275" data-attributes="member: 139299"><p>Frankly, maybe M ought to manufacture the classic Trinovids for L - it isn't as though L hasnt sub-contracted work to M before!</p><p></p><p>tenex, my brother recently acquired the SLC 10x56 WB for the specific purpose of picking out tiny targets at very long distance, and for following birds over cluttered backgrounds (for which jobs, after more than a month's use, probably four to six times a week for stints averaging four to five hours, he considers it performs noticeably better than even the superb 8.5x42 he was using and still uses when the big SLCs are too affected by wind buffet). We were able to compare these with the 10x54 HT which was also excellent, as well as lighter and more handy - but he selected the SLCs as they felt more reassuring in terms of build. I have only used them a few times myself - they still don't match the 8x56 SLC for the pure quality of the view, but are (in my opinion anyway) close enough to the 10x54 HT for there to be very little between them. Very impressive instrument.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Patudo, post: 3675275, member: 139299"] Frankly, maybe M ought to manufacture the classic Trinovids for L - it isn't as though L hasnt sub-contracted work to M before! tenex, my brother recently acquired the SLC 10x56 WB for the specific purpose of picking out tiny targets at very long distance, and for following birds over cluttered backgrounds (for which jobs, after more than a month's use, probably four to six times a week for stints averaging four to five hours, he considers it performs noticeably better than even the superb 8.5x42 he was using and still uses when the big SLCs are too affected by wind buffet). We were able to compare these with the 10x54 HT which was also excellent, as well as lighter and more handy - but he selected the SLCs as they felt more reassuring in terms of build. I have only used them a few times myself - they still don't match the 8x56 SLC for the pure quality of the view, but are (in my opinion anyway) close enough to the 10x54 HT for there to be very little between them. Very impressive instrument. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
Finally compared 15X56 and 12X50 Side-By-Side
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top