What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
Finally compared 15X56 and 12X50 Side-By-Side
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="adhoc" data-source="post: 3689201" data-attributes="member: 131373"><p>This is not as simple as it seems. Among all the 12x and all the 15x binoculars made, different users, depending on their physiology, find different models easier or harder to hold steady, depending on their ergonomics, i.e. weight*, balance and grip. Thus some user may find some 15x model steadier to hold than some 12x model of comparable optical quality to the extent that the 15x shows him/her more detail despite an image at 15x being more vulnerable to be spoilt by shake than an image at 12x.</p><p></p><p>*(PS) To some user, within some range or ranges of weight a greater weight may be easier to hold steady.</p><p></p><p>Personally, to find out which 12x or 15x (among all 12xs and 15xs) will convey most detail to me when hand held, I have been on a lengthy quest involving several/many of them, and have finally narrowed it to these: Alpen Teton 15x50, 795 g and 6.9 in., and Meopta HD 12x50, 1060 g and 6.8 in. One of the former (the model may have just been discontinued) should reach me in a month from now. If it does not do what I hope then it will be the latter. I will also be using this (whichever) with a monopod.</p><p></p><p>Adhoc</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="adhoc, post: 3689201, member: 131373"] This is not as simple as it seems. Among all the 12x and all the 15x binoculars made, different users, depending on their physiology, find different models easier or harder to hold steady, depending on their ergonomics, i.e. weight*, balance and grip. Thus some user may find some 15x model steadier to hold than some 12x model of comparable optical quality to the extent that the 15x shows him/her more detail despite an image at 15x being more vulnerable to be spoilt by shake than an image at 12x. *(PS) To some user, within some range or ranges of weight a greater weight may be easier to hold steady. Personally, to find out which 12x or 15x (among all 12xs and 15xs) will convey most detail to me when hand held, I have been on a lengthy quest involving several/many of them, and have finally narrowed it to these: Alpen Teton 15x50, 795 g and 6.9 in., and Meopta HD 12x50, 1060 g and 6.8 in. One of the former (the model may have just been discontinued) should reach me in a month from now. If it does not do what I hope then it will be the latter. I will also be using this (whichever) with a monopod. Adhoc [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
Finally compared 15X56 and 12X50 Side-By-Side
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top