What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Flat Field technology: the hows, the why's, the consequences
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NDhunter" data-source="post: 3161459" data-attributes="member: 74573"><p>Kimmo:</p><p></p><p>You are one of those around the forum, that have had some time to compare the SV and SF it</p><p>seems.</p><p>As you have read, many are wondering about performance of the new SF, as some contrary observations</p><p>have been mentioned in several ways.</p><p></p><p>Have you spent time with any resolution testing, and comparisons that would be useful to us?</p><p></p><p>Your articles in Alula Magazine were very well done, and I have gone back and found those for a review of</p><p>some older optics. Are you doing any other reviews like that we can find now on the net?</p><p></p><p>Edit to Add: </p><p>Your mention of AMD in these 2 binoculars is interesting, as Zeiss told us they had that all figured out. I have had several years of experience with the SE's, the EDG and the Swarovision</p><p>and I have not ever seen any AMD. I am one that does not know what it is.</p><p>How does the EDG compare in your testing ? I find this binocular a very good compromise</p><p>all the way around.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Jerry</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NDhunter, post: 3161459, member: 74573"] Kimmo: You are one of those around the forum, that have had some time to compare the SV and SF it seems. As you have read, many are wondering about performance of the new SF, as some contrary observations have been mentioned in several ways. Have you spent time with any resolution testing, and comparisons that would be useful to us? Your articles in Alula Magazine were very well done, and I have gone back and found those for a review of some older optics. Are you doing any other reviews like that we can find now on the net? Edit to Add: Your mention of AMD in these 2 binoculars is interesting, as Zeiss told us they had that all figured out. I have had several years of experience with the SE's, the EDG and the Swarovision and I have not ever seen any AMD. I am one that does not know what it is. How does the EDG compare in your testing ? I find this binocular a very good compromise all the way around. Jerry [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Flat Field technology: the hows, the why's, the consequences
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top
