What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Flat Field technology: the hows, the why's, the consequences
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alexis Powell" data-source="post: 3162623" data-attributes="member: 5327"><p>Although I offered a correction to NDHunter/Jerry's post, I still agreed with his main point, which has been lost in this discussion of when flat-field technology was invented. Nikon was the first to put it in a birding binocular, and thank goodness they did. The Nikon 8x40 Classic Eagle was my first top-end binocular. I tried the Leica and Zeiss competition of the time, and I didn't have any special names for what I was seeing, but I found their fuzzy view off-axis impossible to ignore and very disturbing. Given the reputations of the German brands, I couldn't understand why their birding roofs were only sharp right in the middle of the view (just like my Bushnell porros, except with inferior contrast!). When Zeiss introduced phase correction, the superior contrast of the 7x42 BGATP over the Classic Eagle was obvious, and the Zeiss 7x42 was also quite a bit brighter (with its AK prisms) and had a wider field of view, so it became my new birding bin. Still, I really missed the full-field "sweet spot" of the Nikon. It took almost 10 years for Nikon to introduce a phase-corrected successor to the Classic Eagle (the Venturer LX/HG), about 25 years to see flat-field tech in a euro-alpha birding roof (the SV), and an excruciating really long (nearly 30 year) wait to see, in the SF, my favorite qualities of the Nikon Classic Eagle merged with my favorite qualities of the Zeiss 7x42 BGATP. Thank goodness Swarovski took the plunge or else we might still be waiting for Zeiss. All that waiting has done nothing to convince me that the euro-alpha brands have been fully committed to the task of "just trying to make a better bino", at least for birding, or at least until now. But we still haven't seen flat-field from Leica, and we still haven't seen any of these makers of supposedly no-compromise bins use variable-ratio focus, which would greatly improve the performance of close-focusing bins. So I'm not convinced we should be waiting around quietly for them to make improvements/changes as they see fit. As a consumer, I will continue to be a squeaky wheel, in the tradition of Better View Desired and now Birdforum (minus the fanboys). </p><p></p><p>--AP</p><p></p><p>P.S. When I wrote the above, I was thinking based on faulty recollection that the Classic Eagle was introduced in 1986. Actually, it was released in 1984. So my wait times for Zeiss and Swarovski to catch up were underestimates by about 8%.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alexis Powell, post: 3162623, member: 5327"] Although I offered a correction to NDHunter/Jerry's post, I still agreed with his main point, which has been lost in this discussion of when flat-field technology was invented. Nikon was the first to put it in a birding binocular, and thank goodness they did. The Nikon 8x40 Classic Eagle was my first top-end binocular. I tried the Leica and Zeiss competition of the time, and I didn't have any special names for what I was seeing, but I found their fuzzy view off-axis impossible to ignore and very disturbing. Given the reputations of the German brands, I couldn't understand why their birding roofs were only sharp right in the middle of the view (just like my Bushnell porros, except with inferior contrast!). When Zeiss introduced phase correction, the superior contrast of the 7x42 BGATP over the Classic Eagle was obvious, and the Zeiss 7x42 was also quite a bit brighter (with its AK prisms) and had a wider field of view, so it became my new birding bin. Still, I really missed the full-field "sweet spot" of the Nikon. It took almost 10 years for Nikon to introduce a phase-corrected successor to the Classic Eagle (the Venturer LX/HG), about 25 years to see flat-field tech in a euro-alpha birding roof (the SV), and an excruciating really long (nearly 30 year) wait to see, in the SF, my favorite qualities of the Nikon Classic Eagle merged with my favorite qualities of the Zeiss 7x42 BGATP. Thank goodness Swarovski took the plunge or else we might still be waiting for Zeiss. All that waiting has done nothing to convince me that the euro-alpha brands have been fully committed to the task of "just trying to make a better bino", at least for birding, or at least until now. But we still haven't seen flat-field from Leica, and we still haven't seen any of these makers of supposedly no-compromise bins use variable-ratio focus, which would greatly improve the performance of close-focusing bins. So I'm not convinced we should be waiting around quietly for them to make improvements/changes as they see fit. As a consumer, I will continue to be a squeaky wheel, in the tradition of Better View Desired and now Birdforum (minus the fanboys). --AP P.S. When I wrote the above, I was thinking based on faulty recollection that the Classic Eagle was introduced in 1986. Actually, it was released in 1984. So my wait times for Zeiss and Swarovski to catch up were underestimates by about 8%. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Flat Field technology: the hows, the why's, the consequences
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top