What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Four budget bins: a comparative review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrankD" data-source="post: 1264585" data-attributes="member: 18544"><p>FWIW I would wholeheartedly suggest the Celestron's over the Action EX based on image quality alone. I know I am going to tick alot of people off when I say this but I was just sitting on my back patio this afternoon looking at some of the Hummers at the feeders. I had the Ultima DX out along with a Swaro SLC. Now don't go thinking I am going to say they are similar in image quality. Overall they aren't as the Swaro has an almost perfectly flat, distortion free image in comparison to the Ultima DX. However, apparent centerfield sharpness on the DX appeared to be at least as good as that of the SLC and the DX had a more neutral overall image in terms of color representation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I would be cautious of published ER figures. They are not always accurate for a variety of reasons. I was just reading a thread in the Zeiss forum recently where Zeiss listed all of their FL binoculars as having 16 mm of eye relief despite the fact that consumers have found varying amounts with the different configurations. Having said that I did just pull out both my 6x and 8x Yosemites. The 6x does offer slightly more eye relief. I know this simply because when I press my face firmly against the eyecups of the 6x model I begin to see the image start to blacken out around the edges. I do not get this with the 8x model when I attempt the same procedure.</p><p></p><p>FWIW, I get the same result (no edge blackout) with the 8x32 Celestron. Without actually measuring both I would say that the eye relief on the Celestron and the 8x Yosemite is very similar. I prefer binoculars with significant eye relief not because of wearing glasses (I do not) but rather because of the shape/size of my nose and inset of my eyes. Certain bins with short eye relief and wide eyecups (Nikon E2 for example) are unusable for me because of this. I do not have this problem with either the Celestron or either of the Yosemites. This may or may not be helpful in your situation but I thought it something worth mentioning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrankD, post: 1264585, member: 18544"] FWIW I would wholeheartedly suggest the Celestron's over the Action EX based on image quality alone. I know I am going to tick alot of people off when I say this but I was just sitting on my back patio this afternoon looking at some of the Hummers at the feeders. I had the Ultima DX out along with a Swaro SLC. Now don't go thinking I am going to say they are similar in image quality. Overall they aren't as the Swaro has an almost perfectly flat, distortion free image in comparison to the Ultima DX. However, apparent centerfield sharpness on the DX appeared to be at least as good as that of the SLC and the DX had a more neutral overall image in terms of color representation. I would be cautious of published ER figures. They are not always accurate for a variety of reasons. I was just reading a thread in the Zeiss forum recently where Zeiss listed all of their FL binoculars as having 16 mm of eye relief despite the fact that consumers have found varying amounts with the different configurations. Having said that I did just pull out both my 6x and 8x Yosemites. The 6x does offer slightly more eye relief. I know this simply because when I press my face firmly against the eyecups of the 6x model I begin to see the image start to blacken out around the edges. I do not get this with the 8x model when I attempt the same procedure. FWIW, I get the same result (no edge blackout) with the 8x32 Celestron. Without actually measuring both I would say that the eye relief on the Celestron and the 8x Yosemite is very similar. I prefer binoculars with significant eye relief not because of wearing glasses (I do not) but rather because of the shape/size of my nose and inset of my eyes. Certain bins with short eye relief and wide eyecups (Nikon E2 for example) are unusable for me because of this. I do not have this problem with either the Celestron or either of the Yosemites. This may or may not be helpful in your situation but I thought it something worth mentioning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Four budget bins: a comparative review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top