What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
France, warbler
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KnockerNorton" data-source="post: 1256488" data-attributes="member: 66452"><p>Garden give a hard 'tack' so if "harsh clicking or "chekking"" then that fits garden - reed gives a slightly buzzing 'dzrrrrr'.</p><p></p><p>The second pic gives a stong pro Reed colour, but I still can't square that bill with a Reed Warbler, and the links on this page show some interestingly warm-rumped Garden. Analysis of the tail isn't much use, as I don't think we can see enough. Talk of the hind claw is a red herring - it's of no use at all as far as I can tell (if anyone can give a link of the value of colur of hind toes as an i.d. criteria I'll happily change my mind), as I can think of plenty of reasons why it would vary.</p><p></p><p>It still comes down to the bill with me. What am I most willing to believe - that the photos have misrepresented the colour or misrepresented the bill? We all know how the camera can change colours, but I think we can see the bill clearly enough to see it's true shape/length in a good profile shot. So I'm still about 95% garden and 5% reed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KnockerNorton, post: 1256488, member: 66452"] Garden give a hard 'tack' so if "harsh clicking or "chekking"" then that fits garden - reed gives a slightly buzzing 'dzrrrrr'. The second pic gives a stong pro Reed colour, but I still can't square that bill with a Reed Warbler, and the links on this page show some interestingly warm-rumped Garden. Analysis of the tail isn't much use, as I don't think we can see enough. Talk of the hind claw is a red herring - it's of no use at all as far as I can tell (if anyone can give a link of the value of colur of hind toes as an i.d. criteria I'll happily change my mind), as I can think of plenty of reasons why it would vary. It still comes down to the bill with me. What am I most willing to believe - that the photos have misrepresented the colour or misrepresented the bill? We all know how the camera can change colours, but I think we can see the bill clearly enough to see it's true shape/length in a good profile shot. So I'm still about 95% garden and 5% reed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
France, warbler
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top