• BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

    Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Fujifilm HS50 EXR has arrived ! (1 Viewer)

Joms

Well-known member
Thanks for forcing me to confront my real interests. Although it's helpful to know what the camera is capable of producing in the hands of an expert, the kind of stuff shown below is more what I'm after. Not knowing what was going to present itself on my walk around Shoreline today, I just set the camera on EXR (max automation) and fired away.

I learned a lot: mainly, I need a lot more practice. Fortunately, the RTH stayed within sight for several minutes, and his kiting behavior allowed for a few steady shots. Unfortunately, I wasn't fast enough to frame the bird properly when it appeared directly overhead (#3), but I did get something to remind me of the lost opportunity.|:(| The last frame is a ho-hum Northern Mockingbird, taken at about 20 ft. All the pics are cropped and slightly "enhanced" with iPhoto.

I'm rather impressed with Fuji's CA control (chromatic aberration), which is quite apparent to me in other cameras of this type. The 6 MP Canon S3IS, for example, was really poor in this respect, and from what I've seen on the Canon threads, the SX50 seems not to have done well getting rid of the flaw.

Ed

Great shots!
 

elkcub

Silicon Valley, California
United States
Thanks, Joms, I admire your work. :t:

Going back to your settings on post #317, have you changed recommendations since them?

Ed
 

kennethwfd

Well-known member
Have set mine to C/ AF and tracking for moving objects

Find A mode often results in motion blur, while in S mode youneed to crank up esposure compensation

Two blackheaded gulls apparently doing what the birds and bees are supposed to
 

Attachments

  • S0024007web.jpg
    S0024007web.jpg
    202.8 KB · Views: 132
  • S0034016web.jpg
    S0034016web.jpg
    170.3 KB · Views: 136

elkcub

Silicon Valley, California
United States
Nice action! ;)

I've been experimenting with "Sports" and "Landscape" modes. Here's a cropped Bluejay I tracked to the top of the phone poll using Sports mode (i.e., Action program in SP1). It came out f/5.6 at 1/640 sec. A bit soft because of shake at 185mm FL.

I learned another important lesson. Don't use a cheap UV filter!! The first one I got with the camera was a Zeikos. I replaced it with a B+W with multicoating and the IQ improved noticeably. |=)|

I like this camera.
Ed
 

Attachments

  • Bluejay #2.jpg
    Bluejay #2.jpg
    49.8 KB · Views: 144

kennethwfd

Well-known member
Jackdaw. Started to PP but did not like the results so apart from cropping straight out of the camera
 

Attachments

  • S0304105web.jpg
    S0304105web.jpg
    221.5 KB · Views: 140

Keith Dickinson

Well-known member
Opus Editor
Nice plumage detail Kenneth. If that is straight from the camera I'd be well pleased.

I'm am completely fed up at the moment as the weather is not playing fair. Too many overcast days that break into sunshine for extremely short periods. This morning the light was right but the bird didn't play fair, took off even before I got the camera out the case. Hoping for better next weekend when I am on a birding day out from dawn to as long as I can stand it.
 

elkcub

Silicon Valley, California
United States
Last edited:

DavidT.

Well-known member
A couple of average shots from back garden, both cropped as backgounds clashed.

ISO 500 and 250, robin shot in 'Velvia' and sparrow standard film simulation (through double glazing).
 

Attachments

  • S0122284moo.jpg
    S0122284moo.jpg
    418 KB · Views: 151
  • Sunday Afternoon 272moo.jpg
    Sunday Afternoon 272moo.jpg
    475.6 KB · Views: 155
Last edited:

kennethwfd

Well-known member
Nice plumage detail Kenneth. If that is straight from the camera I'd be well pleased.

I assure you it is JPEG fine with just a bit of cropping to balance the picture. I was at Hatchet Pond, one of my favourite locations principally for a swans nest, people are always bringing bread fort the birds (mostly BH gulls), someone had spread some on the ground, and the jackdaw decided to join in.

Not sure of FL, but I don't think it was at full 1000mm.

Started to PP but did not like the effect, so posted as is
 

Wildmoreway

Well-known member
Oh, I use the hood; even inside the case. The wind can go above 20mph around here, so the lens needs protection from flying dust.

My experience both with the HS10 and the HS20 was that use of the lens hood was essential for some reason without the lens hood neither camera seemed to deliver good results.
 

Wildmoreway

Well-known member
Nice plumage detail Kenneth. If that is straight from the camera I'd be well pleased.

I'm am completely fed up at the moment as the weather is not playing fair. Too many overcast days that break into sunshine for extremely short periods. This morning the light was right but the bird didn't play fair, took off even before I got the camera out the case. Hoping for better next weekend when I am on a birding day out from dawn to as long as I can stand it.

Rather than photoshop it may be worth trying using a simple editing program such as picassa, I find that most of the time the simple options in picassa do the job.
 

earleybird

Well-known member
Rather than photoshop it may be worth trying using a simple editing program such as picassa, I find that most of the time the simple options in picassa do the job.

I agree ! I've never photoshopped a single image in the last 4x years. If one of my images is so poor that it needs pp'ing then I bin it rather than waste valuable picture taking time, on the computer.

Photoshopping images is an interesting Art form in its own right but its not for me
ISO 100 f/5.6 FL 90mm 1/170 20feet cropped
 

Attachments

  • Foxy lady portrait mini.jpg
    Foxy lady portrait mini.jpg
    310.9 KB · Views: 172
Last edited:

Joms

Well-known member
I agree ! I've never photoshopped a single image in the last 4x years. If one of my images is so poor that it needs pp'ing then I bin it rather than waste valuable picture taking time, on the computer.

Photoshopping images is an interesting Art form in its own right but its not for me
ISO 100 f/5.6 FL 90mm 1/170 20feet cropped

Great shot. Love the detail
 

DavidT.

Well-known member
Highland cattle on the New Forest today

Nice shots Kenneth, very nice part of the world too.

Following on from a couple of posts here I realised I hadn't tested my camera without the Hoya filter (which I fitted straight after buying), and with the hood that came with it.

Wow, what a difference. Nothing special shot so far but details look clearer, colour nicer and even seemed to be shooting at higher ISOs in what looked like poor light?

Anyway, here are a couple of shots from my quick 15min test. Both have been PP'ed slightly using silkypix. What was most pleasing was that viewed full size there was a lot more detail than I had been getting.

Starling ISO 100 1/160 F5.6 FL185
Mallard ISO 100 1/210 F5 FL44
 

Attachments

  • S0742614re.jpg
    S0742614re.jpg
    469.1 KB · Views: 136
  • S0782624re3.jpg
    S0782624re3.jpg
    414.4 KB · Views: 165
Last edited:

elkcub

Silicon Valley, California
United States
My experience both with the HS10 and the HS20 was that use of the lens hood was essential for some reason without the lens hood neither camera seemed to deliver good results.

What I meant by "even inside the case," was that it's even there in the dark. ;)
But, I'm not surprised that it's essential for improved contrast and reduced reflections.

Ed
 

elkcub

Silicon Valley, California
United States
Nice shots Kenneth, very nice part of the world too.

Following on from a couple of posts here I realised I hadn't tested my camera without the Hoya filter (which I fitted straight after buying), and with the hood that came with it.

Wow, what a difference. Nothing special shot so far but details look clearer, colour nicer and even seemed to be shooting at higher ISOs in what looked like poor light?

Anyway, here are a couple of shots from my quick 15min test. Both have been PP'ed slightly using silkypix. What was most pleasing was that viewed full size there was a lot more detail than I had been getting.

Starling ISO 100 1/160 F5.6 FL185
Mallard ISO 100 1/210 F5 FL44

Hi David,

Are you saying you removed the Hoya filter and the hood? I'm easily confused. :)

For some reason the Mallard pic gave me an error notice.

Hope you don't mind, but I loaded the Starling pic into iPhoto and gave it a global "enhancement." I find the result rather pleasing. Don't know if you can see the difference at your end. Great detail, with beautiful color!

Ed
 

Attachments

  • S0782624re3.jpg
    S0782624re3.jpg
    209.3 KB · Views: 156
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top