What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Glare resistance in binoculars
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OPTIC_NUT" data-source="post: 3294573" data-attributes="member: 121951"><p>Nothing beats a long, ribbed front baffle, nice flat black,</p><p>and a decent step from front to objective.</p><p></p><p>Recent multicoatings have powerful secondary reflections from wider off-angles.</p><p>It's easy to see: tilting the binoculars a lot in the light generates strong reflection</p><p>you can see, and the color varies well off axis. The lore that multicoatings eliminate</p><p>glare caused neglect for a while. Some binoculars had hardly any baffling. </p><p>The real world lighting, shiny off-axis response, and whiffs of dust or film, ravaged that.</p><p>Open chambers, exposed parts, shiny grey linings, shot-peening instead</p><p>of matte coating. Reliance on magic.</p><p>Then the old baffling came back with a vengeance. The improvement in contrast</p><p>from 2012 to 2014 8x32 Diamondbacks is stunning. </p><p></p><p>I don't know what's the best now, but the Vortex line was swept in the new style</p><p>a few years ago, Meopta seems to have never abandonded vigilence, Fujinon</p><p>never wavered, and Nikon recovered from just a few mistakes...</p><p>though the 90's was scary in many places.</p><p></p><p>A lot depends on the year, much better now, but this is one area where looking</p><p>the horse in the mouth in a showroom is important. Looking at something with </p><p>a strong light about 1/2 fov outside the field can reveal things. </p><p></p><p>Some say a wider exit pupil cuts 'veiling glare', but the light does not have</p><p>to hit the EP stops like that if the baffling is good and the fov is not excessive,</p><p>across a few dozen models I checked. Big exit pupils do correlate...it's true that almost any 7x50 made is </p><p>immune to flaring, but the job of baffling is much easier. You can design well for smaller exit pupils</p><p>but you need space and can't go too wide on the view.</p><p></p><p>I have seen the long tunnel AND an old trick, the prism hat, in a few models recently.</p><p>It was worth a chuckle about 'back to the future', but it's scattered enough that</p><p>you would need to look in the showroom. That is awesome, in terms of performing </p><p>across the years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OPTIC_NUT, post: 3294573, member: 121951"] Nothing beats a long, ribbed front baffle, nice flat black, and a decent step from front to objective. Recent multicoatings have powerful secondary reflections from wider off-angles. It's easy to see: tilting the binoculars a lot in the light generates strong reflection you can see, and the color varies well off axis. The lore that multicoatings eliminate glare caused neglect for a while. Some binoculars had hardly any baffling. The real world lighting, shiny off-axis response, and whiffs of dust or film, ravaged that. Open chambers, exposed parts, shiny grey linings, shot-peening instead of matte coating. Reliance on magic. Then the old baffling came back with a vengeance. The improvement in contrast from 2012 to 2014 8x32 Diamondbacks is stunning. I don't know what's the best now, but the Vortex line was swept in the new style a few years ago, Meopta seems to have never abandonded vigilence, Fujinon never wavered, and Nikon recovered from just a few mistakes... though the 90's was scary in many places. A lot depends on the year, much better now, but this is one area where looking the horse in the mouth in a showroom is important. Looking at something with a strong light about 1/2 fov outside the field can reveal things. Some say a wider exit pupil cuts 'veiling glare', but the light does not have to hit the EP stops like that if the baffling is good and the fov is not excessive, across a few dozen models I checked. Big exit pupils do correlate...it's true that almost any 7x50 made is immune to flaring, but the job of baffling is much easier. You can design well for smaller exit pupils but you need space and can't go too wide on the view. I have seen the long tunnel AND an old trick, the prism hat, in a few models recently. It was worth a chuckle about 'back to the future', but it's scattered enough that you would need to look in the showroom. That is awesome, in terms of performing across the years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Glare resistance in binoculars
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top