BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="elkcub" data-source="post: 3177115" data-attributes="member: 14473">Perfect, Samuel, you've confirmed my working conclusions that you are not really "... open to changing [your] opinion, provided it is based on EVIDENCE!," however much you may think so.  It's vastly more complex than you understand, and any new evidence necessarily lies outside the politically correct information bubble. If you look for it there is more than ample evidence dealing with ice core, tree ring and sun spot analysis, ocean layers, pollen records, flora and fauna distributions, past ice extent, and geological substrates to demonstrate that current climatic changes are not particularly unusual geologically, and that man may actually be more of a help than a hinderance at the present time.  I'd be happy to recommend a few good books.  At this point I will end by appending two files.  The first provides some idea as to the reality of how NASA management regarded Dr. James Hansen's AGW theory.   I don't care for Senator Inhoff, but it was testimony before his committee.  I was a senior scientist at NASA-Ames at that time, although in a different field.  Hansen was the chief climate scientist at NASA-Goddard, not NASA's chief climatologist as is often stated in the press.  Second, I've attached Dr. Darko Butina's 2013 very readable expert analysis of the chemistry of the atmosphere and oceans.   Here is some the evidence from outside the bubble that you might wish to consider in detail.  No offense intended with any of this, of course.  Ed</blockquote>

Verification