What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Grant's Storm Petrel
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="l_raty" data-source="post: 1692180" data-attributes="member: 24811"><p>A <em>nomen nudum</em> is basically something that "is out there", but has failed (up to now) to gain any nomenclatural standing. <em>Nomina nuda</em> do not interfere at all with nomenclature.</p><p></p><p>To have "<em>Oceanodroma granti</em>", as currently used informally, interfering with actual nomenclature, you'd need it to be made available (in the nomenclatural sense) by accident. Technically not impossible, but really not that easy these days. (This used to be much easier in the early days of nomenclature.)</p><p>E.g., to have an "<em>Oceanodroma granti</em> Evans, 2009":</p><p>- the Uk400 list should have ended up published in the sense of the Code (i.e., certainly <em>not</em> on a website),</p><p>with, among other things:</p><p>- a description in words of the characters purported to differentiate Grant's S-p,</p><p>- an explicit "new species"-type statement next to the name,</p><p>- an explicit designation of one or more type-specimens and,</p><p>- if these specimens are extant, an explicit statement of the repository where they have been or are going to be deposited.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="l_raty, post: 1692180, member: 24811"] A [I]nomen nudum[/I] is basically something that "is out there", but has failed (up to now) to gain any nomenclatural standing. [I]Nomina nuda[/I] do not interfere at all with nomenclature. To have "[I]Oceanodroma granti[/I]", as currently used informally, interfering with actual nomenclature, you'd need it to be made available (in the nomenclatural sense) by accident. Technically not impossible, but really not that easy these days. (This used to be much easier in the early days of nomenclature.) E.g., to have an "[I]Oceanodroma granti[/I] Evans, 2009": - the Uk400 list should have ended up published in the sense of the Code (i.e., certainly [I]not[/I] on a website), with, among other things: - a description in words of the characters purported to differentiate Grant's S-p, - an explicit "new species"-type statement next to the name, - an explicit designation of one or more type-specimens and, - if these specimens are extant, an explicit statement of the repository where they have been or are going to be deposited. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Grant's Storm Petrel
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top