Absolutely no idea to handle Glareolidae...whose difficulty is not made easier by having the early-diverging genera paraphyletic
Yes for Hemerodromus (used since long time by myself). Keep bitorquatus in RhinoptilusHemerodromus for cinctus, and Macrotarsius for bitorquatus would be a good place to start.
Oui! The prodigal plovers return home.😆So, Pluvialis, Pluvialidae or Pluvialinae within Charadriidae ?
Damned. Nul !!! LolOui! The prodigal plovers return home.😆
Given the age of Turnici, Ortyxelos might prove to be a seperate family?currently available sequence data do not even make it possible to test whether Turnix is monophyletic with respect to the monotypic Ortyxelos. We suggest that sequencing the latter genus as well as additional Turnix species should be a priority for future studies seeking to improve taxon sampling within the Charadriiformes
Yes, also subfamily for Oreopholus?The Pluvialiidae-Charadriidae split is old enough to probably still warrant family recognition
They were not critical enough when they included some sequences in their supermatrix, I'm afraid.Look at Lymnocryptes and Rhinoptilus!! 😲😲😲
This species is not even in the figure 🧐Given the age of Turnici, Ortyxelos might prove to be a seperate family?
Back down to Earth with a bang!They were not critical enough when they included some sequences in their supermatrix, I'm afraid.
The position of Lymnocryptes makes no sense, and is likely due to the RAG1 sequence EF373192, which is probably a chimera -- the first 900 bp of the sequence are fully identical to Limosa haemastica. The position of the Long-billed Plover is certainly not correct either, and undoubtedly due to the use of the mitogenome KY419888, which is a Kentish Plover; at least a recent barcode, MT602072, makes Long-billed sister to Little Ringed. The position of Oriental Plover, away from Caspian, is something I cannot believe either...
Yes, this one needs sequencing!This species is not even in the figure 🧐
Hoploxypterus for cayanus.Can anyone give their opinion on the relationship within Vanellus ? I reduced the number of genera to 8 (previously as many genera as there are species)
Chettusia, Lobivanellus, Hoplopterus...Who knows for the rest.
Belonopterus 😏chilensis and resplendens.
.
🤷Chettusia, Lobivanellus, Hoplopterus...
Belonopterus 😏
It's Esacus magnirostris, nested within BurhinusWhat exactly is Burhinus magnirostris in this study?
My lapwing classification