What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Gull ID form Italy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smiths" data-source="post: 1362272" data-attributes="member: 4346"><p>While I agree that the white tertial crescent looks very prominent on this bird, I would not completely rule out Ring-billed Gull on the basis of this single photograph.</p><p>Judging the colour of the upperparts is always hard in digital shots like this one. It was obviously taken in less than bright conditions (it seems to be snowing? And there is also obvious vignetting effect, visible in the upper right corner of the photo), which may make the grey look darker than it really was. Also, it is not safe to compare with the upperparts of the Yellow-legged Gull in front, as that bird is not at the same angle to the camera.</p><p>Light conditions may create an effect like in this photo of a Ring-billed Gull:</p><p><a href="http://www.pbase.com/image/26688499" target="_blank">http://www.pbase.com/image/26688499</a></p><p></p><p>Also, note that only P9 is visible on the underside of the rear wingtip; P10 must be out of place somewhere. That is why the mirror looks much smaller than the one on the other wingtip.</p><p></p><p>I find it hard to believe that this could be a large gull. The bill is really thin and lacks a gonydeal angle, and the knees look rather delicate (compare with the YLGull in front).</p><p>If this is a Caspian Gull, the dull bill colour (lacking an orange gonys spot), black subterminal band on P10, small mirror on P9 and lack of a long, pale tongue on the underside of P9 would make this a third-cycle bird (third winter). However, 3w Caspian Gull normally shows a distinct, dark eye contrasting with a white head, and that effect is lacking here. In fact, the iris seems to be pale. Another important thing is that there may be some head streaking in this bird; the head certainly looks 'dirtier' than the white breast and belly, an effect not normally seen in Caspian Gull.</p><p></p><p>Except for the tertials, this bird very much looks like a Ring-billed Gull. It would be interesting to see more photographs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smiths, post: 1362272, member: 4346"] While I agree that the white tertial crescent looks very prominent on this bird, I would not completely rule out Ring-billed Gull on the basis of this single photograph. Judging the colour of the upperparts is always hard in digital shots like this one. It was obviously taken in less than bright conditions (it seems to be snowing? And there is also obvious vignetting effect, visible in the upper right corner of the photo), which may make the grey look darker than it really was. Also, it is not safe to compare with the upperparts of the Yellow-legged Gull in front, as that bird is not at the same angle to the camera. Light conditions may create an effect like in this photo of a Ring-billed Gull: [url]http://www.pbase.com/image/26688499[/url] Also, note that only P9 is visible on the underside of the rear wingtip; P10 must be out of place somewhere. That is why the mirror looks much smaller than the one on the other wingtip. I find it hard to believe that this could be a large gull. The bill is really thin and lacks a gonydeal angle, and the knees look rather delicate (compare with the YLGull in front). If this is a Caspian Gull, the dull bill colour (lacking an orange gonys spot), black subterminal band on P10, small mirror on P9 and lack of a long, pale tongue on the underside of P9 would make this a third-cycle bird (third winter). However, 3w Caspian Gull normally shows a distinct, dark eye contrasting with a white head, and that effect is lacking here. In fact, the iris seems to be pale. Another important thing is that there may be some head streaking in this bird; the head certainly looks 'dirtier' than the white breast and belly, an effect not normally seen in Caspian Gull. Except for the tertials, this bird very much looks like a Ring-billed Gull. It would be interesting to see more photographs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Gull ID form Italy
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top