• BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

    Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Hands on with new Mavens (1 Viewer)

[email protected]

Well-known member
Supporter
:smoke:
Perterra, post 40,
Now we have two completely opposite opinions from persons who actually used the Mavens (had them in their hands and before their eyes(Dennis and Steve) and we have the fact sheet from the WEB-site. Now if we can not trust the fact sheet than we have a problem, since 95% transmission generates a briljant bright image and that as yet is not confirmed here without any doubt.
Gijs van Ginkel
I will confirm the Maven B3 8x30 I tried was not nearly as bright as my Habicht 8x30 W which has a confirmed transmission of 95%. NO WAY!:smoke:
 
Last edited:

[email protected]

Well-known member
Supporter
Dennis, post 57,
The Leica Ultravid HD-plus 7x42 and 8x42 have SP prisms and HT glass and they both do not reach a light transmission of 90%, so it seems to be quite a challenge to getvery high values with SP prisms and in our spectrometer we did not catch one as yet.
Gijs van Ginkel
In my practical experience the brightest binoculars I have had have been porro's and I really think they are the only binocular outside of maybe the Zeiss HT that can achieve those kind of transmission numbers. The little Habicht 8x30 W I have now seems brighter than my SV 8x32 and the SV is a BRIGHT binocular.
 

[email protected]

Well-known member
Supporter

Attachments

  • 0168000932_2569.jpg
    0168000932_2569.jpg
    72.6 KB · Views: 88
Last edited:

[email protected]

Well-known member
Supporter
Yes,

We forget times have changed or we think time began when we were born.

I took my Leupold 7x42 BX2 Cascade out to use for a while yesterday. I will carry it around in my car for a while. I paid $229.99 for it 4 years ago. It has a 389' FOV. It is much better than my Green Armored Leitz 7x42 Trinovid BN which I used for many years in the 1990s. The Leitz has a FOV of 420.' I find that I can live with 389' even though my binocular of choice is my Zeiss 7x42 Victory FL which has a FOV of 450.'

Bob
Ceasar

How are the edges on the Leupold 7x42 BX2 Cascade? Pretty sharp to the edge?
 

james holdsworth

Consulting Biologist
Sig Sauer offers 9x45 and 11x45 binoculars with Abbe-Koenig prisms under their Zulu-9 line. No guarantee that these are the same Kama products sold through Maven, but the specs look similar.

http://www.sigoptics.com/product/zulu9/

Additionally, Styrka offers a 15x56 binocular with Abbe-Koenig prisms under their S-9 line. No idea who makes these. Looks like Abbe-Koenig is making a comeback, for those who are interested.

http://styrkastrong.com/products-binocularsS9


The Sig-Sauer Zulu 9 is speced to have both HiDef [sic] and HT glass. Abbe Koenig prisms, HT glass and a pretty cool exterior armouring, looks very interesting.
 
Last edited:

[email protected]

Well-known member
Supporter

Attachments

  • 41GyVy5hxwL.jpg
    41GyVy5hxwL.jpg
    28.1 KB · Views: 104
  • B2_Gray_Black_grande.png
    B2_Gray_Black_grande.png
    192.2 KB · Views: 149
Last edited:

cycleguy

Well-known member
I believe those are referred to as Marlingtons... |;|

In the meantime I was handed down an Asahi Pentax 7x35 wide field 11 degrees model no. 567.... would you know anything about these: history, any good, value, and so on...?

CG
 
Last edited:

chartwell99

Well-known member
Last edited:

[email protected]

Well-known member
Supporter
But you can buy the the real deal, yup the Maven 9 x 45, the finest binocular I have ever owned or used. Ever tried to resolve product problems with Amazon years after purchase? What am I missing?
You wouldn't deal with Amazon.com. You would deal with Sig-Sauer. As far as "real deal" is concerned they are both made by Kamakura. Take your pick on the cosmetics.

INFINITE GUARANTEE
SIG SAUER Electro-Optics are guaranteed forever. It's an unlimited lifetime guarantee.

-Unlimited Lifetime Guarantee
-Fully Transferable
-No Warranty Card Required
-No Receipt Required
-No Time Limit Applies
-No Charge
 
Last edited:

WJC

Well-known member
I believe those are referred to as Marlingtons... |;|

In the meantime I was handed down an Asahi Pentax 7x35 wide field 11 degrees model no. 567.... would you know anything about these: history, any good, value, and so on...?

CG

Boy, are you taxing this old head. Having an 11-degree field, I believe it was the small unit with the oversized prisms. I’m certain I’ve worked on more than one. Particulars, though, elude me. To me, it was just a job. In those days, I didn’t make a life out of binos; I just used them to put my kids through school. The Asahi’s of that era were structurally fine—except for those with the elongated focuser.

I was also less than pleased with the “Gold” coatings on the eyelenses. The resolution degraded pretty badly after about 8 degrees. However, other “Ultra-Wide Angle” binos did the same thing, including the US Navy’s much worshipped 6x42 Square D.

That’s about all I remember, except I would be pleased to own one. :cat:

Sorry,

Bill
 

ceasar

Well-known member
Ceasar

How are the edges on the Leupold 7x42 BX2 Cascade? Pretty sharp to the edge?



Its FOV is stated to be 7.5º on the binocular which comes to 393'@1000yds. The edges are surprisingly good. At least, conservatively estimated; I would say it has an 85% sweet spot without much fade off to the edge. It shows some pincushion distortion on vertical edges.

I have compared it in some respects to my Leica 8x42 UV Black Line which has a 389' FV.

I compared the FOV on both by counting the shingles on the top of my neighbors roof which is about 50' away. They both showed 18 shingles. Pincushion distortion is about the same for each. I note that both of these binoculars have large and generous sweet spots. Today is bright and sunny so they both look good but the Leica is brighter on overcast days and has better color rendition.

Bob
 
Last edited:

[email protected]

Well-known member
Supporter
Its FOV is stated to be 7.5º on the binocular which comes to 393'@1000yds. The edges are surprisingly good. At least, conservatively estimated; I would say it has an 85% sweet spot without much fade off to the edge. It shows some pincushion distortion on vertical edges.

I have compared it in some respects to my Leica 8x42 UV Black Line which has a 389' FV.

I compared the FOV on both by counting the shingles on the top of my neighbors roof which is about 50' away. They both showed 18 shingles. Pincushion distortion is about the same for each. I note that both of these binoculars have large and generous sweet spots. Today is bright and sunny so they both look good but the Leica is brighter on overcast days and has better color rendition.

Bob
Usually a Leica will have excellent color rendition. Those Blackline's outside of a smaller FOV sound like pretty good binoculars and they are exceptionally small which is very nice. If you have a big sweet spot a 390 foot FOV wouldn't be too limiting.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top