What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Harlan's Hawk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tomjenner" data-source="post: 1765026" data-attributes="member: 8453"><p>Bill Clark showed me some of his photos of hundreds of individuals he photographed on passage in Alaska. Although there was a lot of variation there was also a very distinctive patterning to the tails. He has also photographed hundreds of specimens showing similar patterning. This was a couple of years ago, so I don't remember the details. He seemed very convinced of the separation, but it seemed (at the time at least) to be more based on plumage characteristics than anything else and I wondered if that would be sufficient to justify a split. I look forward to seeing the arguments in his final paper.</p><p></p><p>Tom</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tomjenner, post: 1765026, member: 8453"] Bill Clark showed me some of his photos of hundreds of individuals he photographed on passage in Alaska. Although there was a lot of variation there was also a very distinctive patterning to the tails. He has also photographed hundreds of specimens showing similar patterning. This was a couple of years ago, so I don't remember the details. He seemed very convinced of the separation, but it seemed (at the time at least) to be more based on plumage characteristics than anything else and I wondered if that would be sufficient to justify a split. I look forward to seeing the arguments in his final paper. Tom [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Harlan's Hawk
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top