What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Harlan's Hawk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jmorlan" data-source="post: 1882524" data-attributes="member: 1564"><p>Bill Clark was a speaker last November at the "Central Valley Birding Symposium" where he presented his arguments for splitting: <strong><em>[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]"Harlan's and Red-tailed Hawks: their taxonomy, differences, and field identification." [/FONT]</em></strong>It was a long paper with a lot of morphological data. Essentially he was able to show that the supposed hybrids were actually pure Harlan's. </p><p></p><p>The reaction from the the folks I spoke to, including one member of the AOU Check-List Committee was that they were unconvinced. One person told Clark that he had made an excellent case that <em>harlani</em> is a good subspecies. Clark had no evidence of assortative mating in areas of contact or overlap which is what the AOU is looking for. </p><p></p><p>My take was that he started his program with the hypothesis that <em>harlani</em> is a good species and then focused on any and all evidence, especially morphological differences which supported his conclusion. It did not appear to be particularly balanced or objective. </p><p></p><p>I've questioned the maps by Wheeler in "Raptors of Western North America" which show Harlan's overlapping in breeding range with typical Red-tailed. I corresponded with Wheeler on this, and he has thorough data on these nests, but no satisfying evidence that the birds were correctly identified. I brought this up during the Q&A after Clark's presentation and he also questions those maps. </p><p></p><p>What's interesting is that if those maps were correct, they would represent the strongest evidence for <em>harlani</em> as a biological species. One member of the audience reported an apparent contact zone in British Columbia and Clark seemed interested in following up on that.</p><p></p><p>Clark also argued that <em>krideri</em> was merely a white morph of <em>harlan</em>i. With recent studies of krideri on the breeding grounds by Liguori and Sullivan (cited earlier) that seems unlikely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jmorlan, post: 1882524, member: 1564"] Bill Clark was a speaker last November at the "Central Valley Birding Symposium" where he presented his arguments for splitting: [B][I][FONT=Arial,sans-serif]"Harlan's and Red-tailed Hawks: their taxonomy, differences, and field identification." [/FONT][/I][/B]It was a long paper with a lot of morphological data. Essentially he was able to show that the supposed hybrids were actually pure Harlan's. The reaction from the the folks I spoke to, including one member of the AOU Check-List Committee was that they were unconvinced. One person told Clark that he had made an excellent case that [I]harlani[/I] is a good subspecies. Clark had no evidence of assortative mating in areas of contact or overlap which is what the AOU is looking for. My take was that he started his program with the hypothesis that [I]harlani[/I] is a good species and then focused on any and all evidence, especially morphological differences which supported his conclusion. It did not appear to be particularly balanced or objective. I've questioned the maps by Wheeler in "Raptors of Western North America" which show Harlan's overlapping in breeding range with typical Red-tailed. I corresponded with Wheeler on this, and he has thorough data on these nests, but no satisfying evidence that the birds were correctly identified. I brought this up during the Q&A after Clark's presentation and he also questions those maps. What's interesting is that if those maps were correct, they would represent the strongest evidence for [I]harlani[/I] as a biological species. One member of the audience reported an apparent contact zone in British Columbia and Clark seemed interested in following up on that. Clark also argued that [I]krideri[/I] was merely a white morph of [I]harlan[/I]i. With recent studies of krideri on the breeding grounds by Liguori and Sullivan (cited earlier) that seems unlikely. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Harlan's Hawk
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top