What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
harrier id east coast
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pariah" data-source="post: 3281101" data-attributes="member: 23126"><p>If the original photographers could even post any other pics they got it may help matters, especially any flight or open wing/flapping shots.</p><p></p><p>My two cents.</p><p></p><p>I'm actually quite impressed with the facial pattern on this. The white bags under the eyes are perhaps larger than classic but not out of range I suspect, and the mask reaching under the gape looks good.</p><p></p><p>Adding a shot posted on twitter, which I assume is again from same photographer. Hope that's ok. Not the best of resolution, but at least another angle. </p><p></p><p>IMO there is somewhat of a collar there, and I think the over the shoulder angle of the previous pics don't highlight it well. It's not the strongest of boas, or the darkest of crowns which would be wanted for a classic pallid. </p><p></p><p>How would people feel about this bird for example? </p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.tarsiger.com/gallery/index.php?pic_id=vvs1410804836&lang=eng" target="_blank">http://www.tarsiger.com/gallery/index.php?pic_id=vvs1410804836&lang=eng</a></p><p></p><p>Things such as primary length, leg length etc are indeed more subjective.</p><p>Per Corso, female montys often show primary projections well short of the tail tip. </p><p>But I would maybe expect a slightly higher level of throat/upper breast streaking than can be seen here in that case (granted we don't get the angle or resolution that would be optimal for that assessment).</p><p></p><p>Further to (very) subjective features, in my own (admittedly limited) experience, I have often found juv Pallids have a tendency to be brighter and better marked on the upper parts, with a larger upper wing panel than montys. Nowhere near a concrete feature, just something I've often felt regards them.</p><p></p><p>So if I was faced with this bird on the deck, with that face pattern, a decent collar, a boa (albeit not the most solid), the shorter primaries and the strong upper parts patterning, I would be leaning towards Pallid.</p><p></p><p>Again, would be great if the photographer could post more of what they have.</p><p></p><p>Owen</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pariah, post: 3281101, member: 23126"] If the original photographers could even post any other pics they got it may help matters, especially any flight or open wing/flapping shots. My two cents. I'm actually quite impressed with the facial pattern on this. The white bags under the eyes are perhaps larger than classic but not out of range I suspect, and the mask reaching under the gape looks good. Adding a shot posted on twitter, which I assume is again from same photographer. Hope that's ok. Not the best of resolution, but at least another angle. IMO there is somewhat of a collar there, and I think the over the shoulder angle of the previous pics don't highlight it well. It's not the strongest of boas, or the darkest of crowns which would be wanted for a classic pallid. How would people feel about this bird for example? [url]http://www.tarsiger.com/gallery/index.php?pic_id=vvs1410804836&lang=eng[/url] Things such as primary length, leg length etc are indeed more subjective. Per Corso, female montys often show primary projections well short of the tail tip. But I would maybe expect a slightly higher level of throat/upper breast streaking than can be seen here in that case (granted we don't get the angle or resolution that would be optimal for that assessment). Further to (very) subjective features, in my own (admittedly limited) experience, I have often found juv Pallids have a tendency to be brighter and better marked on the upper parts, with a larger upper wing panel than montys. Nowhere near a concrete feature, just something I've often felt regards them. So if I was faced with this bird on the deck, with that face pattern, a decent collar, a boa (albeit not the most solid), the shorter primaries and the strong upper parts patterning, I would be leaning towards Pallid. Again, would be great if the photographer could post more of what they have. Owen [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
harrier id east coast
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top