What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Bird Name Etymology
Helena's Parotia
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Björn Bergenholtz" data-source="post: 4151699" data-attributes="member: 113430"><p>Sorry, but I simply couldn't keep my fingers away from ...</p><p></p><p>• the Eastern Parotia <em>Parotia helenae</em> DE WIS 1897, as "<em>Parotia helenæ", </em>a k a Helena's Parotia, or Helena's Six-wired Bird-of-Paradise (alt. even 'Eastern Lawes's Parotia', by those who consider, alt. considered , it a ssp.; '<em>Parotia lawesii helenae'</em>)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry Paul, I'm not sure I agree, where did you find/read the information of Rothschild's opinion about the "holotype skin" itself <strong>?!?</strong></p><p></p><p>With this said, even if I haven't been able to determine (with a 100% certainty) who truly collected the Type/s, but I tend to believe that the collector (in 1896) was Mr. Amedeo Giulianetti (who worked for Sir William Macgregor), exactly as told by Charles W. de Vis himself (in the very OD).</p><p></p><p>As I see it "Rothschild's opinion" (in 1903) was regarding the specimens kept at/in the Tring collection (England) ... as I read that certain part/article<span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">*</span> Rothschild wrote only about the skins "at present in our possesion", and from what I can tell he didn't write anything about the "holotype", of "<em>Parotia helenae </em>De Vis". And note that it's not to be seen in the BNHM's <em>Bird type specimens </em>database, like other 'similar' specimens (as for example/s, <a href="https://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/collections/zoological-collections/bird-type-specimens/detail.dsml?authorqtype=starts+with&Typeqtype=contains&vol=2&collectorqtype=starts+with&author=de+vis&sort=Genus%2cSpecies%2csubspecies&typedescqtype=starts+with&searchPageURL=search%2edsml&subspeciesqtype=starts+with&yearqtype=starts+with&Speciesqtype=starts+with&Genusqtype=starts+with&locqtype=starts+with&refer=list&sort=Genus,Species,subspecies&beginIndex=1&listPageURL=list%2edsml%3fauthorqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Typeqtype%3dcontains%26vol%3d2%26collectorqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26author%3dde%2bvis%26sort%3dGenus%252cSpecies%252csubspecies%26typedescqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26subspeciesqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26yearqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Speciesqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Genusqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26locqtype%3dstarts%2bwith" target="_blank"><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">here</span></a> or <a href="https://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/collections/zoological-collections/bird-type-specimens/detail.dsml?authorqtype=starts+with&Typeqtype=contains&vol=2&collectorqtype=starts+with&author=de+vis&sort=Genus%2cSpecies%2csubspecies&typedescqtype=starts+with&searchPageURL=search%2edsml&subspeciesqtype=starts+with&yearqtype=starts+with&Speciesqtype=starts+with&Genusqtype=starts+with&locqtype=starts+with&refer=list&sort=Genus,Species,subspecies&beginIndex=0&listPageURL=list%2edsml%3fauthorqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Typeqtype%3dcontains%26vol%3d2%26collectorqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26author%3dde%2bvis%26sort%3dGenus%252cSpecies%252csubspecies%26typedescqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26subspeciesqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26yearqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Speciesqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Genusqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26locqtype%3dstarts%2bwith" target="_blank"><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">here</span></a>); "Presented by the Queensland Museum".</p><p></p><p>Also, note that most of de Vis's specimens ended up in the <em>Queensland Museum</em>, Australia. For example, see Ingram's Arcticle/Paper <em>Avian Type Specimens in the Queensland Museum</em>, in Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 25, from 1987 (<a href="https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/126031#page/246/mode/1up" target="_blank"><u><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">here</span></u></a>), or the excerpt below, and note his choice of words: "all":</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1370599[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Or do you mean that Rothschild actually had that certain specimen, the male one, today "missing", from/in the Queensland Museum collection?</p><p></p><p>However, it doesn't seem to solve the Etymology itself, about whom the dedicatee might be in the Eastern Parotia (Bird-of-Paradise)<em> Parotia helenae </em>DE VIS 1897, as I see it we're still stuck, just as we were back in 2016, with either the Princess or Miss Scott/Mrs Forde.</p><p></p><p>Though, and this I have to admit (again, just like in post #2, from back in 2016). I find it somewhat disturbing that the OD doesn't include a clear and out-spoken dedication, <strong>if</strong> dedicated to a Royal princess (even more so <u>if</u> Sir MacGregor truly was a "rabid royalist ", like Paul put it), simply as most dedications (that we've seen earlier) aimed at certain Royals almost always have been both long and lingering, often somewhat oily and clearly ingratiating, from a 'humble and obedient servant' (that is <u>if</u> MacGregor himself was involved, personally, in coining this name, of course).</p><p></p><p>Either way, to me, this far the shady and obscure; Helen/e/a or even Elena (alt. similar versions of her name) remain in the Dusk, as nothing but an undetermined or still non-identified Lady (contemporary, or not). That is if it's an Eponym at all, of course?</p><p></p><p>Either way, this far, I'd keep the explanation of this Eponym open, just like Phil Gregory did, in his book <em>Birds of Paradise and Bowerbirds </em>(Helm, 2019), <a href="https://books.google.se/books?id=aU_ODwAAQBAJ&pg=PA204&lpg=PA204&dq" target="_blank"><u><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">here</span></u></a> (even if I myself would have written the name of the first suggested, possible dedicatee as Miss Scott/Mrs Ford<u>e</u>, <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> (and that is also; regardless if she, or he, ever was a "true" oologist, or not).</p><p></p><p>Good luck solving it!</p><p></p><p>Björn</p><p></p><p>PS. Or maybe it simply isn't an Eponym!?! Could it possibly be a Toponym<strong>?!?</strong></p><p></p><p>If so, it would/could explain why de Vis coined/used this name without any explanation/dedication what-so-ever. As we've seen other examples when the -ae ending has been used (without any other explanation) for different locations, one might wonder if there could be a map (or text) where the type location "... , Mt. Scratchley" was called <em>Mount Hele</em>n alt. <em>Mt. Helene</em>, or <em>Mt. Helena</em>... ? Or a nearby Hill, Creek, Valley, etc., etc., close to "Neneba, Mt. Scratchley"? Take it for what it's worth, if anything at all, as a suggestion, a possibility, it's just an idea, that suddenly struck me.</p><p></p><p>Either way, more info on the self-willed, and/but zealous C. W. de Vis<span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">** </span>himself, see the Special Issue of Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 28 (1), titled; <em>Proceedings of the de Vis Symposium</em> (<a href="https://ia902602.us.archive.org/30/items/MemoirsQueensla28Quee/MemoirsQueensla28Quee.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">here</span></a> alt. <a href="https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/126027#page/1/mode/1up" target="_blank"><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">here</span></a>), from 1990.</p><p></p><p>/B</p><p></p><hr /><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">*</span><span style="font-size: 12px">The very first part of Rothschild's (and Hartert's) Paper on 'Papuan Birds' started in 1901 (<a href="https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/22660#page/72/mode/1up" target="_blank"><u><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">here</span></u></a>).</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">**</span><em><span style="font-size: 12px">i.e.</span></em><span style="font-size: 12px"> Charles Walter de Vis (1829–1915, born <em>Devis</em>, a name/spelling that he kept and used until 1882), a k a "Thickthorn" (as Pen name/Pseudonym). </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">For <u>ALL</u> taxa (many hundreds!) described by him see Appendix 1 (<a href="https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/126027#page/18/mode/1up" target="_blank"><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">here</span></a>; pp. 12-22).</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Björn Bergenholtz, post: 4151699, member: 113430"] Sorry, but I simply couldn't keep my fingers away from ... • the Eastern Parotia [I]Parotia helenae[/I] DE WIS 1897, as "[I]Parotia helenæ", [/I]a k a Helena's Parotia, or Helena's Six-wired Bird-of-Paradise (alt. even 'Eastern Lawes's Parotia', by those who consider, alt. considered , it a ssp.; '[I]Parotia lawesii helenae'[/I]) Sorry Paul, I'm not sure I agree, where did you find/read the information of Rothschild's opinion about the "holotype skin" itself [B]?!?[/B] With this said, even if I haven't been able to determine (with a 100% certainty) who truly collected the Type/s, but I tend to believe that the collector (in 1896) was Mr. Amedeo Giulianetti (who worked for Sir William Macgregor), exactly as told by Charles W. de Vis himself (in the very OD). As I see it "Rothschild's opinion" (in 1903) was regarding the specimens kept at/in the Tring collection (England) ... as I read that certain part/article[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]*[/COLOR] Rothschild wrote only about the skins "at present in our possesion", and from what I can tell he didn't write anything about the "holotype", of "[I]Parotia helenae [/I]De Vis". And note that it's not to be seen in the BNHM's [I]Bird type specimens [/I]database, like other 'similar' specimens (as for example/s, [URL='https://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/collections/zoological-collections/bird-type-specimens/detail.dsml?authorqtype=starts+with&Typeqtype=contains&vol=2&collectorqtype=starts+with&author=de+vis&sort=Genus%2cSpecies%2csubspecies&typedescqtype=starts+with&searchPageURL=search%2edsml&subspeciesqtype=starts+with&yearqtype=starts+with&Speciesqtype=starts+with&Genusqtype=starts+with&locqtype=starts+with&refer=list&sort=Genus,Species,subspecies&beginIndex=1&listPageURL=list%2edsml%3fauthorqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Typeqtype%3dcontains%26vol%3d2%26collectorqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26author%3dde%2bvis%26sort%3dGenus%252cSpecies%252csubspecies%26typedescqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26subspeciesqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26yearqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Speciesqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Genusqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26locqtype%3dstarts%2bwith'][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]here[/COLOR][/URL] or [URL='https://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/collections/zoological-collections/bird-type-specimens/detail.dsml?authorqtype=starts+with&Typeqtype=contains&vol=2&collectorqtype=starts+with&author=de+vis&sort=Genus%2cSpecies%2csubspecies&typedescqtype=starts+with&searchPageURL=search%2edsml&subspeciesqtype=starts+with&yearqtype=starts+with&Speciesqtype=starts+with&Genusqtype=starts+with&locqtype=starts+with&refer=list&sort=Genus,Species,subspecies&beginIndex=0&listPageURL=list%2edsml%3fauthorqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Typeqtype%3dcontains%26vol%3d2%26collectorqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26author%3dde%2bvis%26sort%3dGenus%252cSpecies%252csubspecies%26typedescqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26subspeciesqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26yearqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Speciesqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Genusqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26locqtype%3dstarts%2bwith'][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]here[/COLOR][/URL]); "Presented by the Queensland Museum". Also, note that most of de Vis's specimens ended up in the [I]Queensland Museum[/I], Australia. For example, see Ingram's Arcticle/Paper [I]Avian Type Specimens in the Queensland Museum[/I], in Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 25, from 1987 ([URL='https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/126031#page/246/mode/1up'][U][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]here[/COLOR][/U][/URL]), or the excerpt below, and note his choice of words: "all": [ATTACH type="full"]1370599[/ATTACH] Or do you mean that Rothschild actually had that certain specimen, the male one, today "missing", from/in the Queensland Museum collection? However, it doesn't seem to solve the Etymology itself, about whom the dedicatee might be in the Eastern Parotia (Bird-of-Paradise)[I] Parotia helenae [/I]DE VIS 1897, as I see it we're still stuck, just as we were back in 2016, with either the Princess or Miss Scott/Mrs Forde. Though, and this I have to admit (again, just like in post #2, from back in 2016). I find it somewhat disturbing that the OD doesn't include a clear and out-spoken dedication, [B]if[/B] dedicated to a Royal princess (even more so [U]if[/U] Sir MacGregor truly was a "rabid royalist ", like Paul put it), simply as most dedications (that we've seen earlier) aimed at certain Royals almost always have been both long and lingering, often somewhat oily and clearly ingratiating, from a 'humble and obedient servant' (that is [U]if[/U] MacGregor himself was involved, personally, in coining this name, of course). Either way, to me, this far the shady and obscure; Helen/e/a or even Elena (alt. similar versions of her name) remain in the Dusk, as nothing but an undetermined or still non-identified Lady (contemporary, or not). That is if it's an Eponym at all, of course? Either way, this far, I'd keep the explanation of this Eponym open, just like Phil Gregory did, in his book [I]Birds of Paradise and Bowerbirds [/I](Helm, 2019), [URL='https://books.google.se/books?id=aU_ODwAAQBAJ&pg=PA204&lpg=PA204&dq'][U][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]here[/COLOR][/U][/URL] (even if I myself would have written the name of the first suggested, possible dedicatee as Miss Scott/Mrs Ford[U]e[/U], ;) (and that is also; regardless if she, or he, ever was a "true" oologist, or not). Good luck solving it! Björn PS. Or maybe it simply isn't an Eponym!?! Could it possibly be a Toponym[B]?!?[/B] If so, it would/could explain why de Vis coined/used this name without any explanation/dedication what-so-ever. As we've seen other examples when the -ae ending has been used (without any other explanation) for different locations, one might wonder if there could be a map (or text) where the type location "... , Mt. Scratchley" was called [I]Mount Hele[/I]n alt. [I]Mt. Helene[/I], or [I]Mt. Helena[/I]... ? Or a nearby Hill, Creek, Valley, etc., etc., close to "Neneba, Mt. Scratchley"? Take it for what it's worth, if anything at all, as a suggestion, a possibility, it's just an idea, that suddenly struck me. Either way, more info on the self-willed, and/but zealous C. W. de Vis[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]** [/COLOR]himself, see the Special Issue of Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 28 (1), titled; [I]Proceedings of the de Vis Symposium[/I] ([URL='https://ia902602.us.archive.org/30/items/MemoirsQueensla28Quee/MemoirsQueensla28Quee.pdf'][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]here[/COLOR][/URL] alt. [URL='https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/126027#page/1/mode/1up'][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]here[/COLOR][/URL]), from 1990. /B [HR][/HR] [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]*[/COLOR][SIZE=3]The very first part of Rothschild's (and Hartert's) Paper on 'Papuan Birds' started in 1901 ([URL='https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/22660#page/72/mode/1up'][U][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]here[/COLOR][/U][/URL]).[/SIZE] [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]**[/COLOR][I][SIZE=3]i.e.[/SIZE][/I][SIZE=3] Charles Walter de Vis (1829–1915, born [I]Devis[/I], a name/spelling that he kept and used until 1882), a k a "Thickthorn" (as Pen name/Pseudonym). For [U]ALL[/U] taxa (many hundreds!) described by him see Appendix 1 ([URL='https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/126027#page/18/mode/1up'][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]here[/COLOR][/URL]; pp. 12-22).[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Bird Name Etymology
Helena's Parotia
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top