What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Hippolais for ID, Flamborough, UK
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hannu" data-source="post: 1292987" data-attributes="member: 19244"><p>Just a few thoughts,... somehow I have more Sylvia-feeling than Phyllosc feeling in this case. In my mind, the overall impression (body shape) of Booted is more Phyllosc than Sylvia. I think that this bird's belly bulge out too much for being Phyllosc or Booted, thus it looks more robust than in suggested Phyllosc and Booted. This is visible in both pics. </p><p>Also the leg colour does not fit well to Phyllosc, but fits well to Garden W or Booted. Also the base of bill looks too strong for being Phyllosc. I admit that this case reminds a lot Booted, but e.g. eye ring is very strong and thus perhaps atypical for Booted (especially below the eye). Also the head looks relative big and the wings (primary projection) looks long in the flying photo, which does not fit so well to Booted. ...But a difficult case indeed!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hannu, post: 1292987, member: 19244"] Just a few thoughts,... somehow I have more Sylvia-feeling than Phyllosc feeling in this case. In my mind, the overall impression (body shape) of Booted is more Phyllosc than Sylvia. I think that this bird's belly bulge out too much for being Phyllosc or Booted, thus it looks more robust than in suggested Phyllosc and Booted. This is visible in both pics. Also the leg colour does not fit well to Phyllosc, but fits well to Garden W or Booted. Also the base of bill looks too strong for being Phyllosc. I admit that this case reminds a lot Booted, but e.g. eye ring is very strong and thus perhaps atypical for Booted (especially below the eye). Also the head looks relative big and the wings (primary projection) looks long in the flying photo, which does not fit so well to Booted. ...But a difficult case indeed! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Hippolais for ID, Flamborough, UK
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top