What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
How are roofs colimated?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WJC" data-source="post: 3417745" data-attributes="member: 25191"><p>In true, 3-axis collimation, the hinge must be taken into consideration, as in G. Dallas Hanna’s view (1953), the hinge is the heart of a binocular. Even so, this vital piece of the process is rarely mentioned in popular literature or on the web. Instead, both sources are filled with the adventures of inexperienced technicians sharing what they have read, or importers trying to offer knowledge as a service.</p><p></p><p>THE IMPORTANT IFs</p><p> </p><p>IF one optical axis is parallel to the axle, and IF screws are only adjusted on the offending side, technicians will find elementary techniques involving rooflines, power poles, or anything else—given the object is distant enough—adequate to restore the binocular to its original collimated condition without the need of more sophisticated techniques or test equipment.</p><p></p><p>IF one must TEST his binocular to SEE if it’s collimated, the test is unnecessary. We all have varying degrees of spatial accommodation. IF the error in parallelism falls within that range, he might say his bino is “collimated.” And, although it is NOT "collimated," it may be aligned just fine... for him!</p><p></p><p>I have performed a conditional alignment on one or two of my binos, when nothing more was needed, and for customers who didn’t want to spend the extra money to get the “Full Meal Deal.”</p><p></p><p>It comes down to whether one MUST have a full collimation job to see better, or his spatial accommodation will do the trick.</p><p></p><p>Clinical or practical? The user must decide. However, following the willy-nilly instructions plastered all over the Internet, the user is not giving that option and although he may perform a fine conditional alignment, he may also be taking the instrument farther away from clinical, 3-axis collimation in the process. In the worst case scenario, it’s like giving a child a hammer, and a handful of bullets, and telling him to do play in the street.</p><p></p><p>There are various studies on the maximum allowable collimation error—and, of course, they’re all different. As soon as I find the one I like best, I will post it on this memo. :cat:</p><p></p><p>Bill</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WJC, post: 3417745, member: 25191"] In true, 3-axis collimation, the hinge must be taken into consideration, as in G. Dallas Hanna’s view (1953), the hinge is the heart of a binocular. Even so, this vital piece of the process is rarely mentioned in popular literature or on the web. Instead, both sources are filled with the adventures of inexperienced technicians sharing what they have read, or importers trying to offer knowledge as a service. THE IMPORTANT IFs IF one optical axis is parallel to the axle, and IF screws are only adjusted on the offending side, technicians will find elementary techniques involving rooflines, power poles, or anything else—given the object is distant enough—adequate to restore the binocular to its original collimated condition without the need of more sophisticated techniques or test equipment. IF one must TEST his binocular to SEE if it’s collimated, the test is unnecessary. We all have varying degrees of spatial accommodation. IF the error in parallelism falls within that range, he might say his bino is “collimated.” And, although it is NOT "collimated," it may be aligned just fine... for him! I have performed a conditional alignment on one or two of my binos, when nothing more was needed, and for customers who didn’t want to spend the extra money to get the “Full Meal Deal.” It comes down to whether one MUST have a full collimation job to see better, or his spatial accommodation will do the trick. Clinical or practical? The user must decide. However, following the willy-nilly instructions plastered all over the Internet, the user is not giving that option and although he may perform a fine conditional alignment, he may also be taking the instrument farther away from clinical, 3-axis collimation in the process. In the worst case scenario, it’s like giving a child a hammer, and a handful of bullets, and telling him to do play in the street. There are various studies on the maximum allowable collimation error—and, of course, they’re all different. As soon as I find the one I like best, I will post it on this memo. :cat: Bill [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
How are roofs colimated?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top