But do you need full protection from the elements? Surely not, unless in exceptional circumstances. Most binoculars are waterproof nowadays, they're armoured and can stand the elements quite easily. Often better - much better - than the people using them. Modern binoculars don't need to be pampered.
Of course, keeping water off the eyepieces makes sense, otherwise you can't see a lot through the binoculars, so you need a rainguard. But that's about it.
Hermann
That actually describes what I do nicely. Minus the dog.If you’re out on a nice paved trail in perfect weather maybe not, but otherwise protection is good. I’m hiking on slick trails often that can also be goat paths, up and down large rocks, all while having a dog pulling me a lot of the time.
The importance of small scratches is overrated. And with good field technique you won't get a lot of dirt on the lenses anyway.Even then, having to stop and clean them sucks and every time you clean them you risk scratching a lens.
To each his/her own. I see my binoculars (and my scope, for that matter) as tools. And I want to be able to deploy them at an instant.So yes, I protect my $3000 investment while I’m out using them.
That actually describes what I do nicely. Minus the dog.
The importance of small scratches is overrated. And with good field technique you won't get a lot of dirt on the lenses anyway.
To each his/her own. I see my binoculars (and my scope, for that matter) as tools. And I want to be able to deploy them at an instant.
Hermann
The implication is mildly insulting. Of COURSE I have changed the length of my straps on my SLCs before finally replacing them with a harness much like the Rick Young type. I do a lot of off trail birding for both work and pleasure and it only takes one time getting hit in the face with your bins to realize that a neck strap is a poor method of carrying your bins. In a bandolier carry the straps need to be a bit longer but still not too long.Bill Oddie (Bill Odddie's Little black Bird Book, London 1980) summed up my feelings how binoculars should be carried (or, indeed, not be carried) more than 40 years ago:
"Even more significant is where you wear your binoculars. It's likely around your neck, I know that [...] but how long is the strap? Binoculars should be on a short strap, nestling high on your chest - a minimum distance from your eyes. Make the strap too short, and you'll not be able to get them over your chin, and you'll probably knock your teeth out. The straps that come with the binoculars are always too long, and you can't usually shorten them without tying knots in them. Dudes never get round to this, perhaps because it spoils the smoothness of the leather. So dudes wear their binoculars down by their waist or even lower, like a sporran. That's not practical because it's a long way up to the eyes. It can also be very painful.
Dudes invariably carry their binocular case slung around their shoulders. Even worse, they sometimes carry their binoculars in the case. Definitely soppy. The case should have been lost long ago; if indeed you ever had one. Or alternatively, it might be used for carrying your packed lunch, tobacco for rollups, or one of those tide-line corpses. If you're really worried about your image - it's safest to throw the case away." (p. 61)
In case you don't know who Bill Oddie is, check the Wikipedia: Bill Oddie - Wikipedia. And get his "Little black Bird Book". It's still an excellent read.
Hermann
Probably not even people here will challenge that statement, but I do wonder how bad the scratch has to be in order for the image degredation to be visible.When you scratch the lens or just the coating you lose optical performance…
Probably not even people here will challenge that statement, but I do wonder how bad the scratch has to be in order for the image degredation to be visible.
The scratch scatters light, and I believe there has to be quite a bit of scattered light before anyone sees it, especially with their non-dominant eye.
What is the name or model of the Mystery Ranch option?I have a mystery ranch bag too but it's more tailored to smaller binos like 8x32's and the like.
If anyone wants a chest harness (I have been known to use one on occasion, but not much while birding), I recommend looking at BinoBro. It's a minimalist, lightweight and unobtrusive option to take weight off neck and protect optics. The beauty is that it's somewhere between a front cover and a case. The back is mostly mesh and there is no real 'lid'. The top curve can simply be folded back to form a quick in/out pocket. His website doesn't do it justice and I recommend watching video reviews?What is the name or model of the Mystery Ranch option?
What is the name or model of the Mystery Ranch option?
Quite. I usually have a backpack with a chest strap connecting the two shoulder straps and a waist strap on which I have a camera holster housing a small-bodied DSLR with lens attached. With 2 shoulder straps and 1 chest strap and a waist strap I am not attracted by any kind of bino harness being quite content with a conventional neck strap.I imagine Messrs Heath Robinson and Rube Goldberg would take great delight in reading this thread.
Under almost all nature-watching circumstances, I'm an original strap, worn conventionally, with bins high-on-chest type.
I'm genuinely surprised that so many find this elegantly simple arrangement unsatisfactory.
Many seem to reject the simple in favor of the complex.
I have never understood this.
Well it's unsatisfactory because it puts all the weight on your neck, makes your neck hot in warm weather, allows the binoculars to bounce into your face if you trip, and it interferes with some articles of clothing. I mean to each their own and if it works for you that is great. But you shouldn't be surprised that it isn't the best solution for lots of birders.I imagine Messrs Heath Robinson and Rube Goldberg would take great delight in reading this thread.
Under almost all nature-watching circumstances, I'm an original strap, worn conventionally, with bins high-on-chest type.
I'm genuinely surprised that so many find this elegantly simple arrangement unsatisfactory.
I'm no less than equally surprised that people can be so incapable of understanding that there are many ways of doing things which bring satisfaction to others, not to mention totally closed-minded to the possibility of doing anything in a manner differing from their own.I'm genuinely surprised that so many find this elegantly simple arrangement unsatisfactory.