• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Feel the intensity, not your equipment. Maximum image quality. Minimum weight. The new ZEISS SFL, up to 30% less weight than comparable competitors.

How do you hear EDG said? (1 Viewer)

SeldomPerched

Well-known member
A dealer mentioned Nikon EDG to me recently and he said it so it sounded like edge. Maybe that's how everyone says it but it hadn't occurred to me before. What do EDG users here say? I just say ee-dee-gee assuming it's short for extra-low dispersion glass (as in the ED suffix for similar photographic lenses. But maybe they put in the g so as to give the idea that the EDG gave users the edge over other makes. Anyone know?
 

NDhunter

Experienced observer
United States
It is pronounced "edge". It is easy to say, and does say it all. ED glass and G, great.
I have enjoyed them ever since they came out in 2009.

I recall a phone call to Nikon service once, and I referred to the "edge", the young twirp I spoke to, did not not understand my
reference. The problem is that this guy did know much if anything about binoculars at all.

Jerry
 
Last edited:

eitanaltman

Well-known member
I say "edge", because that's what it looks like to my brain and it stuck.

If there's an intentional pun, it's likely that they are "sharp to the edge", not "they give you an edge". Or maybe they are the "cutting edge" of performance. Plus of course evoking the "ED glass" aspect.

Also in 2008-09-ish when they were first coming out, I'm sure writing "edge" as "EDG" sounded cool and, um.... edgy? Like when putting the letter "X" made something eXtreme!

Somehow this is making me think yet again about how Nikon completely bungled the marketing of these really spectacular binoculars.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top