What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
How good is Leica's warranty?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 1775158" data-attributes="member: 665"><p>Dave,</p><p></p><p>Given the heft and robustness of the Trinnies, I can see how they would make a good hammer in a pinch. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I doubt if Leica is still making spare parts for Trinovids anymore than GM is making spare parts for Saturns. The "Good Faith" Policy for Trinnies is going to expire after all the parts are gone. </p><p></p><p>It could be that Leica received many more Trinnies than they had anticipated, and hence, the delays. With the high price of Ultravid HDs, they should have been expecting a lot of "Good Faith" repairs on older models, particularly with the recession still on, and the trend being for people to fix what they already have rather than buying new. </p><p></p><p>For example, the remodeling market for houses has been more robust over the past two years compared to new home sales. If not for the "Cash for Clunkers" program, it would have been the same with cars. </p><p></p><p>While housing and transportation are necessities, alpha bins are not. People tend to cut back on luxuries during a downturn, and Leica's sales slump last year reflects that. </p><p></p><p>As far as Zeiss, they probably replace only the new models. If someone sent in a 7x42 B/GA or Victory I for repairs, I doubt if they have enough old stock on hand to replace each one. They either have to fix the old ones or offer the customer a good price on an upgrade. I don't know if Zeiss offers upgrades with a trade-in like Swarovski does, but it would be a good sales strategy to retain customers. </p><p></p><p>Swarovski seems to have the largest stock of discontinued bin parts among the alphas, and that's probably because they went decades without any major changes to most of their bins. The SLCs were mooreorless the same for over 20 years until the new HD model, and the Habicht porros haven't changed since the Crimean Era <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />. </p><p></p><p>Sticking with a proven design has kept the prices on the SLCs fairly reasonable until the recent HD upgrade. </p><p></p><p>I really like the idea of designing something that could last for decades, with only minor upgrades. Consistency and reliability help offset what you might be missing with the "latest and greatest" new designs. And when repairs are needed, it's very helpful to have a lifetime warranty. </p><p></p><p>Plus, when you're paying top dollar, you should be able to expect more "mileage" from the product than a lower ticket item. </p><p></p><p>Every time a manufacturer comes out with a new design, some "bugs" are bound to show up, such as ZR's first gen 7x26 ED2. </p><p></p><p>It's the reason why I stay a version behind in Windows. By the time they developed all the fixes for Vista, if I upgrade to Window's 7, I'd be starting all over again. </p><p></p><p>New designs usually drive up costs. Off-shore manufacturing has off-set that in some brands, but at the alpha bin level, you pay a steep price for incremental improvements. </p><p></p><p>I'm not a Luddite. Innovation is a good thing, we wouldn't have had the roof bin revolution if not for p-coatings, but at some point, you have to draw the line and say enough is good enough or you're going to end up with $3,000, $4,000, and $5,000 binoculars. </p><p></p><p>If your salary keeps pace with those prices, then no problem. But if you're "working harder for less" like a lot of people are today in the US, as labor unions go the way of the premium porro, and high paying manufacturing jobs go overseas and are replaced with lower paying service sectors jobs, and laid off workers are forced to take lower paying jobs, many people are going to be priced out of the alpha bins market. </p><p></p><p>Fortunately, the second tier bin market is growing and will be able to pick up the slack at more affordable prices. </p><p></p><p>And with Nikon's, Swaro's, and now Leica's excellent used bin repair policies, binofans can also enjoy older alphas.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 1775158, member: 665"] Dave, Given the heft and robustness of the Trinnies, I can see how they would make a good hammer in a pinch. :-) I doubt if Leica is still making spare parts for Trinovids anymore than GM is making spare parts for Saturns. The "Good Faith" Policy for Trinnies is going to expire after all the parts are gone. It could be that Leica received many more Trinnies than they had anticipated, and hence, the delays. With the high price of Ultravid HDs, they should have been expecting a lot of "Good Faith" repairs on older models, particularly with the recession still on, and the trend being for people to fix what they already have rather than buying new. For example, the remodeling market for houses has been more robust over the past two years compared to new home sales. If not for the "Cash for Clunkers" program, it would have been the same with cars. While housing and transportation are necessities, alpha bins are not. People tend to cut back on luxuries during a downturn, and Leica's sales slump last year reflects that. As far as Zeiss, they probably replace only the new models. If someone sent in a 7x42 B/GA or Victory I for repairs, I doubt if they have enough old stock on hand to replace each one. They either have to fix the old ones or offer the customer a good price on an upgrade. I don't know if Zeiss offers upgrades with a trade-in like Swarovski does, but it would be a good sales strategy to retain customers. Swarovski seems to have the largest stock of discontinued bin parts among the alphas, and that's probably because they went decades without any major changes to most of their bins. The SLCs were mooreorless the same for over 20 years until the new HD model, and the Habicht porros haven't changed since the Crimean Era :-). Sticking with a proven design has kept the prices on the SLCs fairly reasonable until the recent HD upgrade. I really like the idea of designing something that could last for decades, with only minor upgrades. Consistency and reliability help offset what you might be missing with the "latest and greatest" new designs. And when repairs are needed, it's very helpful to have a lifetime warranty. Plus, when you're paying top dollar, you should be able to expect more "mileage" from the product than a lower ticket item. Every time a manufacturer comes out with a new design, some "bugs" are bound to show up, such as ZR's first gen 7x26 ED2. It's the reason why I stay a version behind in Windows. By the time they developed all the fixes for Vista, if I upgrade to Window's 7, I'd be starting all over again. New designs usually drive up costs. Off-shore manufacturing has off-set that in some brands, but at the alpha bin level, you pay a steep price for incremental improvements. I'm not a Luddite. Innovation is a good thing, we wouldn't have had the roof bin revolution if not for p-coatings, but at some point, you have to draw the line and say enough is good enough or you're going to end up with $3,000, $4,000, and $5,000 binoculars. If your salary keeps pace with those prices, then no problem. But if you're "working harder for less" like a lot of people are today in the US, as labor unions go the way of the premium porro, and high paying manufacturing jobs go overseas and are replaced with lower paying service sectors jobs, and laid off workers are forced to take lower paying jobs, many people are going to be priced out of the alpha bins market. Fortunately, the second tier bin market is growing and will be able to pick up the slack at more affordable prices. And with Nikon's, Swaro's, and now Leica's excellent used bin repair policies, binofans can also enjoy older alphas. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
How good is Leica's warranty?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top