What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
How long did it you take to learn digiscope?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rob lee" data-source="post: 1678862" data-attributes="member: 20150"><p>O.K. I know im getting carried away now so heres the last 3. </p><p>Hey, i might even start a gallery. </p><p> On another note, like Steve i find Picasa more than sufficient for my pp needs, note the left wing of the Swallowtail, i (mostly) removed a blade of grass that was right across it. I could have spent more time & done a better job but felt that the current result was good enough. This is another area that a lot of people can get awfully anal about. I recently took a pic of a R.N.Phalarope that a friend of mine asked me to send him the original file of, he processed it through CS3 & sent it back. I prefered my Picasa version. I guess what im saying is that if you get the shot good enough in the first place then you shouldnt need to do to much to it. My style of digiscoping is more to wait for the moment rather than rattle off a load of shots in burst mode, another reason why i prefer a low ISO so as to try & get a cleaner looking image rather than a faster shutter speed to freeze motion. Horses for courses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rob lee, post: 1678862, member: 20150"] O.K. I know im getting carried away now so heres the last 3. Hey, i might even start a gallery. On another note, like Steve i find Picasa more than sufficient for my pp needs, note the left wing of the Swallowtail, i (mostly) removed a blade of grass that was right across it. I could have spent more time & done a better job but felt that the current result was good enough. This is another area that a lot of people can get awfully anal about. I recently took a pic of a R.N.Phalarope that a friend of mine asked me to send him the original file of, he processed it through CS3 & sent it back. I prefered my Picasa version. I guess what im saying is that if you get the shot good enough in the first place then you shouldnt need to do to much to it. My style of digiscoping is more to wait for the moment rather than rattle off a load of shots in burst mode, another reason why i prefer a low ISO so as to try & get a cleaner looking image rather than a faster shutter speed to freeze motion. Horses for courses. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
How long did it you take to learn digiscope?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top