What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Digiscoping Cameras
How much quality should we expect from digiscoping?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neil" data-source="post: 1502739" data-attributes="member: 1568"><p>I wish I had a video of the long lens guys chasing this the bitterns around the park over the last week. They are using a combo of tripods and monopods on 300/4 to 600/4s . Bob's photo in the comparison photo ( earlier thread ) was shot hand held ( he always shoots this way with this combo ) and from just behind me. Of course he has no image stabilisation with this setup. The long lens guys had to keep moving as they were getting too close and the bittern kept hiding behind cover. Also the noise of the motor drives was distracting it from catching dragonflies although after a week of this he is getting more used to it. On occasions when the Black Bittern was sighted (it's bittern migration here ) you actually had the long lens guys running around the pond with their tripod/lenses over there shoulders. A little bit annoying to the other users of the park.</p><p>I suspect it won't be long before tripods are banned in the park.</p><p>I was able to stand back behind the pack with me tripod set low and and get full frame images as the bittern kept peaking out of the foliage. Also when it flew to the other side of the pond (15 - 25 metres ) I was able to get the shot without moving ( composite image previous thread ).</p><p>So for close distances I was at around 840 mm which was similar to the 500/4 plus 1.4x and the guys with the 5D Mk 11 had twice as much resolution as I did with the G1.</p><p>When looking at the photos taken by some of these guys their photos are showing more detail , but I would say that it is more the difference between the quality of their glass compared to the G1 kit zoom , than anything else. With a fixed, ED glass lens like the Olympus 50/2.0 the differences would be less obvious. </p><p>Obviously compared to a G10 or P6000 the difference would be more obvious. Here is a comparison of the G10 v the G1.</p><p>Neil</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neil, post: 1502739, member: 1568"] I wish I had a video of the long lens guys chasing this the bitterns around the park over the last week. They are using a combo of tripods and monopods on 300/4 to 600/4s . Bob's photo in the comparison photo ( earlier thread ) was shot hand held ( he always shoots this way with this combo ) and from just behind me. Of course he has no image stabilisation with this setup. The long lens guys had to keep moving as they were getting too close and the bittern kept hiding behind cover. Also the noise of the motor drives was distracting it from catching dragonflies although after a week of this he is getting more used to it. On occasions when the Black Bittern was sighted (it's bittern migration here ) you actually had the long lens guys running around the pond with their tripod/lenses over there shoulders. A little bit annoying to the other users of the park. I suspect it won't be long before tripods are banned in the park. I was able to stand back behind the pack with me tripod set low and and get full frame images as the bittern kept peaking out of the foliage. Also when it flew to the other side of the pond (15 - 25 metres ) I was able to get the shot without moving ( composite image previous thread ). So for close distances I was at around 840 mm which was similar to the 500/4 plus 1.4x and the guys with the 5D Mk 11 had twice as much resolution as I did with the G1. When looking at the photos taken by some of these guys their photos are showing more detail , but I would say that it is more the difference between the quality of their glass compared to the G1 kit zoom , than anything else. With a fixed, ED glass lens like the Olympus 50/2.0 the differences would be less obvious. Obviously compared to a G10 or P6000 the difference would be more obvious. Here is a comparison of the G10 v the G1. Neil [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Digiscoping Cameras
How much quality should we expect from digiscoping?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top