I don't know anything about eBird, but my reading of that screenshot is that it lists how many checklists people have completed, not how many species they have seenWondering why Peter Kaestner's list isn't on the screenshot in the OP? Or does he no longer use e-bird?
I..... I.....have no words 🙃It is the number of complete checklists completed this year.
Isaac is now at 9,912 complete lists this year, which is 36 per day, including 10 lists this morning from his garden, presumably, each of 3 minutes long. Not sure why anyone would do this rather than one 30 minute list.
Seems weird to me too, but takes all sorts 🤷It is the number of complete checklists completed this year.
Isaac is now at 9,912 complete lists this year, which is 36 per day, including 10 lists this morning from his garden, presumably, each of 3 minutes long. Not sure why anyone would do this rather than one 30 minute list.
Good point man, see, I am trying to get an accurate representation for science about the times that the birds most frequent, I know, completely, what all of you must be thinking, "This has to be fake" but it actually isn't. Complete checklists can be a very interesting topic though, I'm trying to get an accurate representation about the times that each bird arrives, it seems weird, but this is true, because I will go inside after about 4-5 minutes and then make a new checklist.It is the number of complete checklists completed this year.
Isaac is now at 9,912 complete lists this year, which is 36 per day, including 10 lists this morning from his garden, presumably, each of 3 minutes long. Not sure why anyone would do this rather than one 30 minute list.
I promise you it isn't fake, I can explain, reach out on FB, please.I..... I.....have no words 🙃
But it won't count as a complete though, and completes are the best way to submit data to eBird. It would be incidental, and that would look even worse...Without any disrespect to the original poster [who is clearly to be applauded], if you want to win this, just go to your local park and submit one checklist for each individual bird you see. Rinse and repeat about 45 times (based on my local park). Alternatively use another app which allows you to capture sightings individually but in a single "session"; then submit those to ebird without the hassle of designating all those new separate lists by hand
But it's complete if I say it's complete. The problem is that a "trip" is ill-defined. You are encouraged to break longer trips into shorter ones, and at one point at least you could not upload traces/distances of over a certain no of kms [I fell foul of this in the Masai Mara]. If I choose to break my visit to the park into 200 individual observation mini-trips then so be it.But it won't count as a complete though, and completes are the best way to submit data to eBird. It would be incidental, and that would look even worse...
I am very sure the community of eBird reviewers would frown upon that.If I choose to break my visit to the park into 200 individual observation mini-trips then so be it.
But they actually encourage you to divide your trip into smaller chunks—at least as far as I understand the guidance. Ebird somewhat recognises that the proper way to record is the actual location you see each bird.I am very sure the community of eBird reviewers would frown upon that.
Niels
Your checklist is complete if:
- You made your best effort to see or hear all the birds around you