What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
I had to move a nest.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pete Mella" data-source="post: 1858756" data-attributes="member: 47236"><p>I don't agree - as I've already said I could have put my words with a bit less hostility, but my points still stand. If I've read Canadian law correctly (and I must admit it's based a few minute's Googling, so I'm willing to be put right here) migratory species such as phoebes are protected, and legal permits are required to disturb their nests. Perhaps there were extenuating circumstances that meant this barn really couldn't wait a few weeks to be demolished, and perhaps permits were acquired and it was all above board.</p><p></p><p>But the fact that the OP had to come on a forum to ask about the consequences after the event made me suspect otherwise - if advice had been sought before the demolition as to the rights and wrongs of it then I suspect they'd have also received advice how to minimise the damage, and wouldn't have needed to trawl the internet for answers.</p><p></p><p>Also, they weren't asking for ways to undo their damage. They've done what they've done, and they're looking for people to tell them everything will be OK. Well it won't - the birds probably won't find the old nest, and it's lucky they're restarting a new one, with a breeding attempt that may not be at the optimum time for them.</p><p></p><p>I don't really know the situation in the USA and Canada, but I live in a country where people are prosecuted for removing active martin nests from their eaves, for example. I'm sure many projects happen where nests are quietly swept in the bin, but they shouldn't.</p><p></p><p>I make no apologies for caring more about birds' welfare than a man's barn. If that makes me self-righteous then so be it. And at this time of year, with breeding birds around at times when people may be wanting to undertake building work, it pays to remind anyone searching this forum for answers that no, in many cases simply destroying inconvenient nests isn't something you can do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pete Mella, post: 1858756, member: 47236"] I don't agree - as I've already said I could have put my words with a bit less hostility, but my points still stand. If I've read Canadian law correctly (and I must admit it's based a few minute's Googling, so I'm willing to be put right here) migratory species such as phoebes are protected, and legal permits are required to disturb their nests. Perhaps there were extenuating circumstances that meant this barn really couldn't wait a few weeks to be demolished, and perhaps permits were acquired and it was all above board. But the fact that the OP had to come on a forum to ask about the consequences after the event made me suspect otherwise - if advice had been sought before the demolition as to the rights and wrongs of it then I suspect they'd have also received advice how to minimise the damage, and wouldn't have needed to trawl the internet for answers. Also, they weren't asking for ways to undo their damage. They've done what they've done, and they're looking for people to tell them everything will be OK. Well it won't - the birds probably won't find the old nest, and it's lucky they're restarting a new one, with a breeding attempt that may not be at the optimum time for them. I don't really know the situation in the USA and Canada, but I live in a country where people are prosecuted for removing active martin nests from their eaves, for example. I'm sure many projects happen where nests are quietly swept in the bin, but they shouldn't. I make no apologies for caring more about birds' welfare than a man's barn. If that makes me self-righteous then so be it. And at this time of year, with breeding birds around at times when people may be wanting to undertake building work, it pays to remind anyone searching this forum for answers that no, in many cases simply destroying inconvenient nests isn't something you can do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
I had to move a nest.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top