What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
I had to move a nest.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bkrownd" data-source="post: 1859337" data-attributes="member: 44104"><p>One thing to be considered here is that in North America a man's home (or barn) is his Castle. If an animal violates it, removal is seen as perfectly reasonable. The idea that somebody's going to get in trouble for booting a common bird out of the interior/surface of THEIR property is laughable, and screams bureaucratic abuse of power in many peoples minds. Start sending "wildlife officers" (AKA, the Big Bad Abusive Gubmint) after people over this and there will be a backlash against conservation. Big photogenic bird, perhaps would get sympathy. Endangered bird, maybe. Maybe. Common bird, no.</p><p></p><p>As it is, conservation is on a shaky enough footing with public opinion here. If you start requiring that people put up with guests in their attics and businesses, the hostility will get worse. Appealing to the public's kind hearts is a better way to go. Some will get the message, some won't. Choose your battles carefully. Allies are more valuable than enemies. Believe me, the birds get VASTLY worse treatment in many other ways on a daily basis than some nests being removed from buildings.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bkrownd, post: 1859337, member: 44104"] One thing to be considered here is that in North America a man's home (or barn) is his Castle. If an animal violates it, removal is seen as perfectly reasonable. The idea that somebody's going to get in trouble for booting a common bird out of the interior/surface of THEIR property is laughable, and screams bureaucratic abuse of power in many peoples minds. Start sending "wildlife officers" (AKA, the Big Bad Abusive Gubmint) after people over this and there will be a backlash against conservation. Big photogenic bird, perhaps would get sympathy. Endangered bird, maybe. Maybe. Common bird, no. As it is, conservation is on a shaky enough footing with public opinion here. If you start requiring that people put up with guests in their attics and businesses, the hostility will get worse. Appealing to the public's kind hearts is a better way to go. Some will get the message, some won't. Choose your battles carefully. Allies are more valuable than enemies. Believe me, the birds get VASTLY worse treatment in many other ways on a daily basis than some nests being removed from buildings. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
I had to move a nest.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top